As far as managers go, Cox is pretty good. However, I'm not always sure the manager makes that much difference, or not as much as we tend to give them credit for. I'm not sure who I heard make this analogy, but regardless, I'm stealing it. The manager is like the groom at a wedding. He has to be there, and he looks important, but he might be the fifth or sixth most influential person at the ceremony. The bride is the most important, followed probably by the mother of the bride (yeah, we all know she called half the shots), the minister, the father of the bride (who had to fit the bill), probably the pianist, caterer , and then finally the groom somewhere along there. The manager looks important, but the success of the team depends more on the individual players, the GM, the Latin American scout, and then maybe the manager. Or better yet, read this blurb from a conversation years ago between Tommy LaSorda and Paul Mainieri. Link. So, while I think Cox is a good manager, his run of greatness is more due to the work of the Braves front office than Cox. But, his willingness to play the young players and constantly work those players into the fabric of the team probably helped the success of the franchise.