Jump to content
North Side Baseball

vance_the_cubs_fan

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    35,766
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by vance_the_cubs_fan

  1. What teams would look at Byrnes as a starter? If there are none, he'd definitely be a nice option for the bench.
  2. And ironicly, it will still be better than last year's outfield.
  3. Yeah, but one member said the thread should be locked b/c of its optimisim and another called it "idiotic". I don't think eitherof those reactions fall within the spirit of this bd. I agree with that sentiment as well, and the poster who suggested it be locked was chastised by the mods as well.
  4. We're a long way from being a good baseball team, too, Jim.
  5. Williams is likely a starter until Wood returns to the rotation, but I fear he doesn't have a spot there unless Rusch struggles mightily.
  6. Largely agree. Group think and over reaction reign on here currently. Yes, we all get together to decide what should be the board response to every post. Thanks for the assinine post.
  7. Ok...I might could see trading Walker if it improves the team, but to put him behind Perez and JHJR for playing time is just stupid! You're not really surprised are you? A little surprised...a little dissapointed...a little pissed off. Many feelings on this one.
  8. From today's Sun-Times: Ok...I might could see trading Walker if it improves the team, but to put him behind Perez and JHJR for playing time is just stupid!
  9. The author and his opinion are welcome, but to get upset that others criticized it is ridiculous. Should I not be allowed to post my criticism of the post just because others will also agree with me. And yes, there may be a pessimistic view around here....but some would simply say it is realistic. While I have been seen as one being critical to Dusty and Hendry's offseason moves, I was on the other side of the fence prior to 2005 season. (If the search function was working, I'd show you for proof.) If someone can't handle having their opinion critcized and dissected, I'd suggest not offering it for public consumption.
  10. Unfortunately, Craig Wilson was tendered a contract by the Pirates as Josh Fogg was their only non-tender. The White Sox non-tendered Willie Harris. The Orioles non-tendered Eric Byrnes. Timo Perez was also non-tendered. I guess the Cardinals don't consider Bo Hart the answer at secondbase, as he was non-tendered as well. A few interesting non-tenders: Junior Spivey IF, Nationals. Miguel Olivo C, Padres. Trever Miller LHP, Devil Rays. Ryan Franklin, RHP, Mariners. Danny Kolb, RHP, Brewers.
  11. Trade Patterson to the Red Sox for David Wells.
  12. Byrnes wouldn't be bad as a fourth or fifth outfielder. We have some extra payroll, so he'd be a decent option.
  13. Reyes will be in the rotation. One of two things will happen. Ponson will bomb in spring training (very likely), or Ponson will be good in spring training, and Marquis will be traded for outfield help. You forgot option three- Ponson will be arrested in Spring Training.
  14. Ponson will be as bad in the Cardinals rotation as Jones will be in the Cubs line-up. Looks like the teams are matching bad move for bad move.
  15. Woah woah woah Mr. Primadona. Your a good player, one of the best? hardly. The best leadoff hitter in the game? Don't make me laugh.... Apparently Damon read and believed all the hype Scott Boras has been saying about him.
  16. I started a thread a couple of weeks ago in which I suggested Rond-DL would make a great option.
  17. If we have Jones for three years, can we now trade Pie and Jerome Williams for Dunn?
  18. While we're working on getting a clutch hitter, can we sign some gnomes, fairies, centaurs, elves, and dragons. Because those mythological creatures are as based in reality as clutch hitting.
  19. My wife is wondering why I've used multiple profanities for no reason tonight.
  20. And I agree that is what is likely to happen, but since he was tendered, that immediately adds him to the 40-man. He's there until a trade happens. I really don't see a Tejada trade happening, but I could see the extra cash being used to either extend Lee by increasing his contract for this year in exchange for cheaper value in future years... or we could pursue one of the pitchers left on the market like Weaver. I don't see us having the cash to pursue Millwood until Corey is traded.
  21. Ok, with the Jacque Jones signing, here is our 2005 Cubs... C Michael Barrett- 4 million 1b Derrek Lee- 8.667 million 2b Todd Walker- 2.5 SS Ronny Cedeno 350K 3b Aramis Ramirez- 10.5 Lf Matt Murton 350 K Cf Juan Pierre 5.5 (arb estimate) Rf Jacque Jones 5.33 SP Kerry Wood 12 SP Mark Prior 3.55 SP Carlos Zambrano 5.5 (arb estimate) SP Greg Maddux 9 SP Glendon Rusch 2.75 Bullpen CL Ryan Dempster 5 Scott Williamson 2 Scott Eyre 3.7 Bob Howry 4 Will Ohman 400K Micheal Wuertz 400K Bench John Mabry 1 Jerry Hairston 2.5 (arb est) Corey Patterson 3 (arb est) Neifi Perez 2.5 Henry Blanco 1.5 That's 24 players at 95.997 million. There will be either one more in the pen (Novoa, Welly, Koronka, Williams at roughly 400 K) or another bat on the bench that would cost maybe 1 million. If we make a trade, we could still add roughly 9 million in salary and maybe more if we traded a salary like Patterson off the roster. So, what's the next move, or is this the team that will take the field on Opening Day against the Reds?
  22. Maybe now is the time to deal Patterson to the Red Sox.
  23. Seriously, you have to be laughing your butt off right now. You must be loving every minute of this. I know I would if the Cards signed Jones. I don't know that he has room to laugh just yet...is Taguchi, Edmonds, Bigbie really any better than Murton, Pierre, Jones ?
  24. I don't know why he would. We don't have any more "holes" on this team. (In reality, we do...but Hendry had addressed everything:leadoff, rigthfield, bullpen) I could understand (not necessarily agree) trading Walker to improve somewhere like rightfield, lead-off, centerfield, bullpen...when those weren't filled in other ways. But now, it only makes sense to trade Walker for a legitimate upgrade. Our offense is still the weak part of this team. If Hendry trades Walker, then not only is he stupid, but he'll prove his stubborness takes precedence over creating a good ball club. Walker is better than any secondbaseman we have. He's signed a RF...and traded for a lead-off CF...Walker isn't expensive, so there's no need to dump his salary. Trading Walker "just for the hell of it" makes no sense. I can't see it happening. If it does, it will be a dumber move than locking up Jockcrap Jones to a three year deal.
×
×
  • Create New...