Disagree. This is a great scoring system. It doesn't take any skill to go chalk by picking all the favorites. It takes guts to pick 5s over 12s like Western Kentucky, Arizona and Wisconsin and props to those that picked Cleveland State. You didn't pick any upsets and you were penalized for it. It's a simple as that. i don't care that i'm doing bad. i'd be doing bad with either scoring system, its irrelevant to my point. the simplest and best scoring system is to reward people who pick the most correct games. this scoring system doesn't do that. i don't care about who has "guts" or some other nonsense, it should be who picks the winners correctly regardless if its an upset or not. Those pools tend to be boring with the majority of the participants picking the lower seeds. Most brackets look relatively the same. It's a lot harder to pick upsets and those that do should be rewarded. i agree with your first statement. but the key for winning pools with a large number of entries is picking the majority of the games correctly and also nailing the key upsets. people that do that correctly should win. in this system, there's definitely a reward for people simply picking a lot of upsets in hopes of getting "bonus points". either way, this isn't that big of a deal, but i'm just not a fan of this scoring.