I'd rather have Rich Hill over Sean Marshall because Hill still has a higher upside and doesn't have Marshall's injury history. While I trust your opinion is accurate it doesn't seem logical here. Hill is older, has less velocity, less control, less # of pitches and can't show any consistency. Marshall has seemingly grown over the offseason and has surpassed Hill. The only negative is his unknown injuries. less consistency? hill is coming down off a stretch of baseball nearly equal to a full season where he was one of the top 5-10 pitchers in all of baseball. has marshall even strung together more than five consecutive good starts in his career? what's the longest run of good health he's ever had? three months? and that's not even considering hill's vastly superior minor league numbers. by the way, every one is crapping themselves over hill's last four starts...his four starts before that... 27 2/3 ip, 18 h, 5 bb, 24 k's, 1.63 era, 0.83 whip i'm concerned about him right now too, but let's have a little perspective. I am NOT crapping myself about Hill's last starts. I am stating my case why I choose Marshall over Hill. When has Marshall been injured? After his first Big league season when he threw more high energy innings then ever before. He started 19 games last season, and started off well. He has come back strong this season and has shown some excellent stuff. How many quality starts does he have? Hill is inconsistent at the level that matters. Minor league numbers are a great indicator of possibility but not performance. Hill has been up and down in MLB, no question about that. Why would this change now? How long do we give him to develop? Marshall vs Hill and they have extremely similar stats. I don't understand the love for Hill and the constant being that he is going to be a top 10 pitcher when Marshall is showing the same skills and attributes, is younger and has other options to throw and yet he is not getting the same kind of attention.