Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Magnetic Curses

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    29,978
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Magnetic Curses

  1. gould and eovaldi for dempster and lahair? where do i sign? i understand that the dodgers have the great james loney at first and have inexplicably started him for several years in a row, but i'd imagine lahair is an upgrade. although i think loney has pictures of someone.
  2. again, max contract guys that are worth having are not going to be coming to the midwest. they go west, east, or south.
  3. maybe they're just conceding that they'll never ever be able to lure a star free agent to the rust belt (as it's never happened before) so they're loading up on what they do well.
  4. maybe they're planning on trading noah. just trying to figure out why they'd do it.
  5. this is like the time that chief wiggum got his tie stuck in the hot dog roller.
  6. So agree on Michael Schur. Hey, it's pretty tough being a fan of THE NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS, THE BOSTON CELTICS AND THE BOSTON RED SOX. That's at least 6 championships since a team I care about won a championship - 14 years ago. don't forget the boston bruins won the cup.
  7. ryan braun is in a new commercial for kwik trip and he couldn't look like more of a douche.
  8. we're going to get 50 walks from our whole infield combined ostensibly, rizzo by himself will get more than that.
  9. if we trade barney, valbuena sliding over to second and vitters playing third next year wouldn't be too bad.
  10. don't blame spending big on free agents for the cubs' woes, that is a luxury that many teams wish they had, and it will one day make us a very good team.
  11. oh, ok, you said "or" so i thought you meant one of them. and i think any deal with vancouver would be contingent upon them taking back crawford. which wouldn't be so bad for them, even though he's not a good everyday starter, he's experienced enough to step in and can get hot from time to time. i have no idea what it would take to get luongo, but like has been said, we'd be bailing them out so i don't think it would have to be a lot.
  12. Wouldn't you prefer they take back Crawford? Otherwise Chicago is back to being stuck with a ridiculous cap hit of $8.0m on goalies. I think the key is getting them to take back some cap crap like Crawford, Montador or Frolik. doesn't he suggest frolik? i would prefer that they take back crawford, definitely, though.
  13. and that certainly is a huge sample size
  14. what did he suggest? sorry, i meant biitner
  15. i don't think they'll get a ton of value for him and now they're pretty much locked-in to trading him. vancouver hates us so i doubt that they'd deal him here, but that would be excellent if we could get him for what flames suggested.
  16. BUT HE FLOPS AROUND IN THE PLAYOFFS AND TIM THOMAS IS IN HIS HOUSE EATING BREAKFAST EVEN THOUGH HE NEVER INVITED HIM
  17. how has this hairlip been shutting us down?
  18. I don't think Theo is ready to spend big this offseason, so that eliminates Hamels. and yet theo knows that he has no passable arms and the only way he's going to get them is if he signs them in free agency. signing hamels and/or greinke in the offseason is the best bet to be ready for contention in a year or two. pass on either of them and you're going to have to deplete the farm to do that. you're acting as if they're looking for one-year deals.
  19. i don't see the logic. again, this is a guy that got four playoff shutouts in 2011 alone. you're relying a whole lot on an intangible and bordering on superstition. i want no part of crawford going into the season as our starter.
  20. Haha, right. How is his playoff track record not relevant? And aside from all that, THE CONTRACT! There's no way we can do that. so the fact that he is a very good goaltender isn't relevant either?
  21. history indicates that he's an elite goaltender that posted his best season at at the age of 31, a year in which he also posted 4 playoff shutouts.
  22. i think it's like many sports in which good players are more likely to be good and bad players are more likely to be bad.
×
×
  • Create New...