First time, he was coming off TJS and a 6+ ERA. The second time, he would be coming off a league leading ERA among starters and on a team with a lack of starting pitching. The point isn't even whether or not there would be significant consequences. If you want to turn your organization into one of the premier franchises, it's probably not best to act like a petulant child. we were talking about legal consequences. but expecting another year like this one out of an old pitcher who has never been this good probably isn't smart, either. the best thing they could hope for would be a trade, they had one in place, he vetoed it, so they sent an old pitcher to the bullpen to try to get a few extra years out of him. they don't need old starters, they need young starters.