What is he right about? Everything in the last year not involving the Sean Marshall trade. Yeah, okay. Anyway, you were right to say it's leap to assume absolutely that because his h/r splits were essentially even that he gained no advantage from Coors. That said, your original statement made it sound like you were saying that his decent numbers had been propped up by Coors, which seems like weak assertion given his h/r spits and the "just because his splits aren't skewed it doesn't mean he wasn't helped out" response a likely hedge from someone who hadn't actually checked the splits. And Warpticon never said Stewart was never aided by Coors, he implied that it was unlikely he had received much benefit, given his h/r splits. Which is a pretty reasonable assessment, imo. It wasn't even about receiving benefit from Coors so much as not receiving detriment from being outside of it. Kyle's assertion was that not hitting at Coors was a reason why he wouldn't hit elsewhere...even though he had hit elsewhere already. "He probably can't hit outside of Coors!" "But he hit better outside of Coors when he was good." "Yeah, um, well, you can't ignore park factors!" is a pretty silly argument.