Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Bertz

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    13,439
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Bertz

  1. One of the things that helps too is the three guys with the biggest question marks (Mervis being a rookie, Conforto/Bellinger for injury) are all lefties, while the team has RHH bats coming out its ears. You obviously can't tenably manage three concurrent platoons every day, but it does raise the floor on each of those guys significantly. I also wonder if, thinking through the above, the rumors aroundMancini would be in addition to Conforto rathwr than instead of. Mancini-Wisdom-Other Catcher-Mastrobuoni is a pretty killer bench paired with the lineup you laid out above. Obviously that would require passing the LT though.
  2. I think that's a bit overstated, particularly with the Yankees who also explicitly punted offense at SS last year. Of course having an Aaron Judge papers over a lot of ills. That said I don't disagree with the thrust of what you're saying. A few things to consider though: - The league average OPS at C was .672 last year with a .295 OBP. The bar is so low that Yan Gomes actually projects as an above average hitter for the position, as does Curt Casali. Perez and Barnhart project below but only to an extent that nets out to -5ish runs compared to an average catcher. Their lines look so egregiously bad because we're benchmarking off of Contreras, not because they're actually all that bad. We're not talking Austin Hedges - Speaking of Contreras, a common refrain among the fanbase is "the offense already sucked last year even with Contreras." It did, but something to keep in mind is the Cubs also had some of the worst 1B production in the league last year. Schwindel and Rivas combined for nearly 600 PAs of hitting like a below average catcher last year, that basically cancels out the boon from our catcher hitting like a good 1B. There's a legit 3 WAR swing from Schwindel and Rivas' actual production last season to what Mervis is projected for this upcoming one. The offense was likely improved a bit year-over-year before the offseason even started - After they add a DH, the Cubs will have eight guys on the projected OD roster who project as average or better hitters, plus a couple more in Iowa. And Wisdom and Bellinger are only a smidge below that line. Though Bellinger is clearly an extremely high variance guy offensively at this stage The lineup doesn't look that great because there's no monster hitter to serve as the linchpin. But they're deep, likely to be average to good offensively everywhere but catcher and CF. And those two positions, by virtue of that depth, have several contingencies built in if things go sideways. There's a pretty hard cap on how good this offense can be by virtue of how little offensive star power there is, but given the number of fallback options I'd say it's very unlikely to end up bad even with a pretty blah duo at catcher.
  3. A number of teams are all in on the soft stuff catchers provide. The Astros with Maltin Maldonado and Yankees with basically everyone they've run out post Gary Sanchez are the prime examples. The Dodgers before Will Smith were leaning on Austin Barnes a lot more than anyone thought they should have too. It's en vogue for a lot of smart teams right now. And like even in our own back yard check out how Cubs pitchers performed last year with Gomes behind the plate vs. with Contreras. It's a stark difference. There's obviously a huge appeal to authority happening here, which isn't great, but at least the Cubs aren't alone in making it. I would very much prefer Perez (who does more of the obvious catcher defense things very well) or Casali (who's a pretty good offensive catcher) even going down this route. I think the only thing Barnhart does well that's quantifiable is hit left handed. One ray of sunshine on the catcher front is Miguel Amaya. Even after missing most of two seasons, he projects very well. He's likely an option in the second half.
  4. I'd guess the sacks and don't forget two fumbles. I'm hoping/assuming it's not opponent adjusted, because those things are bad but against the Eagles some of that's just gonna happen.
  5. Given the competition, that was pretty clearly the defense's best game of the year right? Between that and Fields chalk up another tank win, though I obviously don't love all the injuries.
  6. I'm just imagining Poles running to midfield waving his arms frantically yelling "Stop the show!" like he's Uncle Leo
  7. Apparently Mooney threw out Casali and Roberto Perez as guys the Cubs are also looking at. Perez is the best easily by publicly available defensive stats. Casali is easily the best hitter. Barnhart is a switch hitter. All three guys have a lot of NL Central experience.
  8. I'm cool with Barnhart but you've gotta go harder at DH. No horsefeathering Trey Mancini. Bring me Conforto or Brantley. But like this is a real lineup: 2B - Hoerner (110 projected wRC+) DH - Conforto (117) LF - Happ (114) RF - Suzuki (128) CF - Bellinger (97) SS - Swanson (104) 1B - Mervis (122) 3B - Morel (105) C - Gomes (92)/Barnhart(77) I'd take the under on Gomes' offensive projection while being the primary C, and the error bars are obviously quite wide around all three lefties. But that team projects quite well on both sides of the ball.
  9. He was first with Swanson yesterday so I guess give it some credence.
  10. Don't forget extending Hoerner. My hope is that there isn't much plan to leave a few mil for the deadline, the Padres showed you can do a lot and still stay under, and if they're competitive and wanting to add maybe that's the motivation to push over the line. The best version of this is probably Madrigal for a reliever, Smyly, a bat for ~10M, and whichever catcher you end up with(none of the options should be > 5M). Yeah good call, there's essentially no way to fit a Hoerner extension in at this point if we're looking to stay under the LT. That's a good sign, Jed laid it on pretty thick that he'd like to accomplish that. I guess something like this would technically work but doesn't feel very realistic? Smyly ~$7M Hoerner ~$8M Catcher ~$2M DH ~$8M RP ~$2M
  11. Smyly is aiming lower than I would have liked after Taillon was the top guy. That said Smyly is obviously solid, he took well to the team's systems and coaching, and I'd imagine it's a fairly efficient signing. If signing Smyly instead of someone a little better is what lets Jed get Conforto at DH instead of e.g. Matt Carpenter that's a win. Still really curious about the LT. Smyly would be another ambiguous sign about how they're approaching it. After Swanson the team has just under $30M to the tax. Smyly likely eats up $8-10M. On the one hand, that's technically enough for a bat at <$10M, a very cheap catcher, a cheap reliever, and leaving s few mill for the deadline. But on the other Smyly seems like a weird splurge if you're going to be running so tight everywhere else?
  12. Really strong ZiPS projections for Swanson. 4+ WAR the next two years, 3+ the two after that, and even in year 6 he'd still prorate out to just over 2 WAR on a per 600 PA basis.
  13. I've been wondering about this too. Lots of guys I've looked at this winter play left side of the infield and have noodle arm grades. Justin Turner was another I noticed recently. I kind of wonder if outfielders wreck the grade curve a bit here? They get a lot more running start 100% effort throws. Like Javy by this measure is also only 70th-80th percentile, and we know he's got a mega elite arm. Swanson's good enough at SS right now that he probably stays there for most of his deal. Probably the last year or two though we should assume he'll be at 2B. Which I wonder if that impacts any Hoerner extension talk? Probably not?
  14. He sounds very confident in the Conforto thing
  15. Didn't make the connection til I saw it on Reddit but the two biggest contracts in Cubs' history have now been given to guys traded for Shelby Miller.
  16. Cubs need a big bat, but as a pure DH and a righty I don’t think Martinez was a great fit for the Cubs.
  17. Just from 20-21 he was 34th in WAR, still ahead of Trout and Devers, also ahead of Nolan Arenado, Sean Murphy, Jose Altuve, Yordan Alvarez, Brandon Nimmo, Trevor Story, etc. yeah he had anomalously high value from baserunning & fielding efficiency, pretty reminiscent of a former Braves standout our offense is still very likely quite worse than an already pitiful offense from last year despite now spending pretty significant money from an artificially tight budget 3 years in a row? Quite the anomaly!
  18. I think especially if you're cruising past the luxury tax it's a tough pill to swallow to sign Eovaldi, but I don't have a super high opinion of him though. The upside is there compared to your Smylys and Klubers, but I just don't think that HR rate is gonna stay low enough to be more than an averageish SP. For me, the biggest questions are 1) is the LT a hard limit now that you've banked Swanson? 2) can you trade for a C that's better than the remaining FA(Jansen, maybe Murphy, etc)? and 3) what type of arm can you get for Madrigal? 4) what AAV is gonna be needed to extend Hoerner now? You basically have to trade for a catcher if you want to fill every spot with an unequivocally good player. My guess at a good but more likely offseason would probably be to trade for the other SP and handle everything else via FA, and catcher's just going to be someone uninspiring who gets high marks for the more nebulous parts of the job. But yeah the LT is the big question now. I am cautiously optimistic, the way things have played out they can a still do one more multi-year deal and still start next offseason at approximately the same payroll they started this one at (and that's assuming Stroman opts in).
  19. Dansby Swanson is 13th in position player WAR the last three years ahead of players such as Carlos Correa, Mike Trout, Bryce Harper, Corey Seager, Fernando Tatis Jr, and Rafael Devers. because of the career year Just from 20-21 he was 34th in WAR, still ahead of Trout and Devers, also ahead of Nolan Arenado, Sean Murphy, Jose Altuve, Yordan Alvarez, Brandon Nimmo, Trevor Story, etc.
  20. So Swanson got within a rounding error of exactly what the ZiPS projections thought he should have gotten.
  21. Dansby Swanson is 13th in position player WAR the last three years ahead of players such as Carlos Correa, Mike Trout, Bryce Harper, Corey Seager, Fernando Tatis Jr, and Rafael Devers.
  22. My ideal path forward from here is something like: - Nate Eovaldi (2/40) - Trade for Danny Jansen - Sign Taylor Rogers (1/10) - Sign Michael Brantley (1/15) - Trade Madrigal for the best young reliever he can net you You blow past the luxury tax, but so much comes off after this year that you can be very active in FA again next winter and still duck back under the tax then. And that's a really good and deep team. Light on stars but good essentially up and down the entire roster.
  23. The former, but not by much.
  24. That'd be my hope. I'm sure Jed doesn't want to give up the Contreras pick but Eovaldi is really good and can probably be had on a two year deal.
×
×
  • Create New...