Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Bertz

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    13,439
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Bertz

  1. I would love for Yelich to be a dirty rotten cheater, but it's just a combo of his kneecap exploding and his raw power being in the good-not-great sweetspot where he disproportionately benefited from the juiced ball.
  2. I'll add https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/l/lowelmi01.shtml I think with Bellinger the primary reason for optimism is that the decline is 100% attributable to the injury. Like it's a direct line. He hurt his shoulder, and since then there's been less thunder in the bat, evidenced a few ways but IMO most conclusively via his drop in top end exit velocity. He didn't start hitting a bunch of pop-ups or grounders, which would be a sign of Heyward-esque mechanical problems. His plate discipline didn't suddenly go to hell either (he's chasing more, but it looks like that's tied to him getting pitched around less). It's the injury. Full stop. Like I'm usually the annoying guy who can't go three sentences in April without saying "Small Sample Size." But like if Bellinger's got .900-something OPS two weeks into the season and a couple balls north of 110 MPH I'll already be fully bought in.
  3. Counterpoint: great time to get a glimpse at some of the organizations "rising stars" and lesser-knowns. Meh, its hard (at least for me) to parse through what is relevant and what is not relevant when it comes to Spring Training performances. Because of that I really don't care to watch spring training at all. I check back in this thread every 4-5 days to see whats going on It really sucks that most of the AZ stadiums don't have Statcast. Because it'd be a lot easier to find concrete things to hang our hat on. There are things like velo and exit velocity that mean something even in small samples and fake games. As it stands I know there was a study a few years ago that mentioned that ST walks and strikeouts had a little bit of predictive value. So I know I'll personally be looking at those for the kids and also Bellinger.
  4. Mule came in the top 30. Do you all think he will be in instructs all year? I wouldn't be surprised with a little bit of time at Myrtle late in the year after that last big wave of promotions. A la Koen Moreno last year. Really the type of guy who makes you miss having short season leagues.
  5. Let's assume Seiya has to miss opening day and Davis has a really big spring. Do you give him the primary RF job until Suzuki gets back? He's got nearly 250 PAs at AAA, plus this will be his second spring training largely in big league camp, plus his alt-site time in 2020, plus a smidge of AFL time. He's got a decent amount of experience against MLB-adjacent pitching, even if much of it came last year while he was physically impaired by the back issue.
  6. Yeah I think Transactions is the toughest call among the sports focused forums. I'd lean keeping it separate, but at the same time Cubs discussions is a ghost town during the offseason because the most natural thing to talk about are Transactions.
  7. The messaging on the Seiya stuff is a little all over the place. A couple things that were said that make me think he'll be back by opening day and this is largely a big to-do because they're being mindful of how bad he wanted to play in the WBC, and there's a few things that were somewhat ominous make me think the over/under on him getting back is May 1st.
  8. Timing is as fortunate as could be but still have to imagine this keeps him out the first few weeks of April
  9. Let's horsefeathering go!
  10. Ummmmm if Anthony Kay wants to average 96 I might need to get excited about him
  11. I think mine is 1. PCA 2. Davis 3. Alcantara 4. Wesneski 5. Wicks 6. Canario 7. Caissie 8. Horton 9. Mervis 10. Hernandez 11. Brown 12. Made 13. Ballesteros 14. Triantos 15. Ferris 16. Kilian 17. Estrada 18. Palencia 19. Amaya 20. Hodge I probably ought to discount Canario more, but my POV is I'm going to wait until he's clearly diminished while back on the field before making the move. Kilian is the guy who I'd be most likely to bump up multiple spots very quickly. If he gets back to throwing strikes I could quickly argue him up to 9 and on the positive side of that tier-break.
  12. Merryweather looked great. The run was purely from bad defense
  13. My totally unbiased opinion (because I'm not a Ben Baldwin hater- he does some good stuff) This chart is total trash. He makes directionally "accurate" claims, but they are just claims that other analytical trade charts have done much better. It's not enough to just be directionally accurate when you're so far over in your end conclusions and values. My Fuller responses to it: Interesting, so this analysis is largely the football equivalent of $/WAR leading you to wanting two 1.5 WAR outfielders for the same price as one 3 WAR one? That's one of the interesting things about where the Bears are at. If they had either the money or the draft picks IMO it'd be very clear that they just need to plug as many holes as possible. But because they have both, I do think they need to do a few things that are maybe a bit SABR-unfriendly. Maybe that's paying market rate for a RB, maybe it's not completely maximizing their trade down to prioritize coming down with a Carter or Anderson, etc. But while he should mostly be responsible and think long term, Poles should take a couple swings at maximizing impact over efficiency.
  14. Very mathy, but TLDR is we WAY overrate the value of a top 5 pick for a non-QB. This would tell us to focus more on the Raiders or Panthers even if it means passing on Carter and Anderson. I think Raw's generally been on this page all offseason?
  15. Taillon looked damn good that first inning. I thinknthat might have been the sweeper he got Kwan with?
  16. I saw on BleacherNation this AM but hadn't otherwise seen it discussed that Tucker Barnhart is planning on ditching switch hitting this year. He already had pretty stark splits: 77 wRC+ vs. righties the last three years compared to 56 wRC+ vs lefties. If dropping switch hitting makes those more stark, something more like 85/40, I think that's a worthwhile tradeoff to get those vs. RHP numbers up closer to respectability. I do wonder what the plan is for Gomes/Barnhart. Are they going to be largely platooned to maximize what little offense there is, or is each guy going to own the relationship with 2-3 SPs and time behind the plate will be doled out that way.
  17. This is one of the first times I can remember where both split squad teams were reasonably interesting instead of all of the fun players of course being on the non-televised game.
  18. Cool, shorter game. Now I get to go spend my time, money and resources doing something other than consuming the MLB product. Again. What’s the business proposition in all this? It seems like an absolute money loser and adding no new fans. If you don't think shaving 30+ minutes of dead time off of every game doesn't help MLB's positioning as an entertainment product I think you're alone on that island. :dontknow:
  19. 18 runs in 3 hours and 6 minutes. This thing is friggin amazing.
  20. 16 runs and counting and this game is still on track to end in under 3:30. Really awesome stuff
  21. My boy Yonathan with the RBI. Definitely gonna see MLB this year.
×
×
  • Create New...