Jump to content
North Side Baseball

We Got The Whole 9

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    11,584
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by We Got The Whole 9

  1. Glad they're building around Rooker
  2. The Brewers weren't afraid to hand the keys to a rookie(s) and let him take his lumps and they ran away with the division. There's enough cover in the lineup to throw Shaw to the sharks. Similarly they're not afraid to put rookies on the bench either. It's up to Counsell and staff to put them in advantageous spots and develop their games.
  3. I'd trade Aliendo. Ramirez, and Gray for him
  4. I really hope Amaya has been working like a dog to improve defensively this winter, becoming more flexible and explosive.
  5. I'm thinking Tucker should command a salary not too far below Soto's, right? We're talking about a more complete player and more of a chance to provide defensive cover for 5 or so years. He's probably thinking he should get 12/500 or even 600 if he has another monster year like that.
  6. Those murmurs about Davis were known since right after the signing. We definitely talked about it here.
  7. Now I'm thinking they trade for that guy and sign Minter and Robertson. That would be sick.
  8. Happ Suzuki Tucker Dansby Busch Nico Amaya PCA Shaw
  9. Screw the bench pay for premium relief and Flaherty
  10. To Astros in 2023: Can I interest you in Chris Morel, Hunter Bigge, Hayden Wesneski, and our first round pick from this year?
  11. Do the Cubs make this trade if they don't have Shaw?
  12. Well this looks to be going down. Jed talking the big swing we've been waiting for. LFG.
  13. I'm preparing to lose Smith but really hope Caissie is the main prospect.
  14. To this I believe the difference is the approach. PCA is a different level of aggressive. But I've also shouted from the mountain tops that I thought his floor was really high because of the other parts of his game. I really didn't think 1.5-2 war would be outsized expectations for a guy that has absolutely mashed at every level and then took his OB game to new heights last season. I do believe he's capable of being above-average with the bat and the rest of his game will determine how valuable he really is on a WAR level at least.
  15. That would take more of the ammo cache from Jed I'm sure
  16. I don't think a single person has intimated that he is a ready-made All-Star the way we did with Bryant. I only posted on PSD back then but there was definitely a large contingent of fans there that didn't believe the bust talk and thought we had a potential ROY, possible 5 war player. Again, the narrative around Shaw here has been, he's probably ready, needs a little protection, has some flaws that the MLB will expose, and will have some lumps. Nobody is screaming that this guy has nothing left to prove aside from the other guy getting chided in this thread today. The hype has been nothing like KBs.
  17. Those loses to the Redskins were horsefeathers brutal. Definitely still had a SB defense but they just had no offense left.
  18. Was thinking the same. They struggle sv LH, especially the funky slot ones.
  19. I feel like the amount of available impact players on Tucker's level is very small, and the target needs to be at that level for Jed to consider Shaw. The amount of good 3B in the league is very small also. So if I were trading Paredes, then I would hold onto Shaw tightly as well, because the alternative options are not attractive and Smith probably needs a year at least and there's not enough pro data on him yet. So yeah, to me, if he didn't move him for Crochet he probably doesn't want to trade for Tucker or anybody. Paredes is an arb-eligible starter controlled for 3 years and not 1 and who will make less than half of that guy that they have no expectation apparently of resigning. That makes sense to me. If I say, it looks like the Cubs are ready to run with Shaw, to noone in particular, just throwing an opinion out there, that is condescending? Condescending to me is when someone quotes my post and in the last couple lines basically says "sheesh Cubs fans". Like talking down to someone as if they don't know what they are talking about. I don't believe there would be many posters here who feel like I do that.
  20. Nobody has really KB'd Shaw, first off. He has received nowhere near the hype KB had and the posts around him have not annointed him a can't-miss star prospect either; in fact I would argue that his visible warts have been brought up and I think the expectation for him if he were to start with the club are fairly lukewarm. At least from my perspective. I believe he can start right away and be about a 2 win player with plenty of room to grow. I'm very interested in seeing what kind of value he provides outside of the bat as well. I do believe that Jed would love to run with Paredes cheap production for a few years but I also believe 2 things: 1) He realizes that HOU was #2 on him and he wants Tucker badly, 2) He saw the dip in production and the xstats and feels like the fit might not be there. Stop being so condescending.
  21. God I hope it isn't the Polar Bear
×
×
  • Create New...