I would add to this that getting into a bidding war for their new manager doesn’t make much sense if we blame the Ricketts for the penny pinching.
I know manager salary is a drop in the bucket compared to player salary, but if it were an ownership directive to scrimp and save rather than Hoyer’s roster building philosophy, paying $8 million a year for a manager when you could be paying $3 million a year for a different, perfectly credible manager doesn’t make sense.
it doesn’t make any difference to ownership if you go $5million over market for a manager or a relief pitcher. Money is money. So the reason management is willing to reset the market at the field manager position but not for players probably isn’t due to ownership preference.