I was referring to several of the other hits he allowed. And yes, the ground balls that the fielders booted were also hard-hit. If he hadn't been unlucky they were booted, he'd have been very lucky they were at'em balls. He was adequate last night, but nothing particularly special. Whether you consider that "good" or not is semantics. He should have only allowed 1 run, and that on a home run from a guy who homers off of everybody. He was pounding the zone and was not just "adequate", he was the good Zambrano. Not to mention that ridiculous 2nd inning wore him down and made him throw a ton of pitches. If Derosa turns that double play I can say with confidence that he would have gone at least 7 innings, giving up just the one run. I can say with confidence that a pitcher giving up 1.25 baserunners per inning (excluding ROE) is probably not going to go 7 IP/1 run unless he is very, very lucky. Did you even watch the game? If Theriot uses his glove or Derosa turns the double play there's one of his ER taken off. If Zambrano finished the 7th instead of Cotts the 3rd run probably doesn't score. Boom, 7 runs 1 inning right there (that's no my speculation, that's simple math), and that's not even counting the fact that 2 of those baserunners shouldn't count since you can't expect a pitcher to get 6 outs in an inning. Also, how many of those hits were really hit that well? Furcal's was a bunt, that's not Zambrano's fault. The hit and run single that bounced off Theriot's hand wasn't his fault. I can't remember the other hits, but I do remember him throwing hard and pounding the bottom of the strike zone. Really guy, it's okay to admit that a Cubs player played well. It won't kill you to do that. Zambrano didn't walk guys, he was missing bats, and he stayed relatively calm. Stop acting like he didn't pitch well.