Jump to content
North Side Baseball

17 Seconds

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    23,965
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by 17 Seconds

  1. After they go to San Antonio they have a pretty nice run of mediocre/crappy teams on the schedule @ Philadelphia Philadelphia @ Milwaukee Washington New York @ Memphis New Jersey @Charlotte LAC Hopefully they can go on a nice little rune there
  2. that's what i was thinking. i was all hyped up for rose banging down the winner at the buzzer and then when he missed and hughes drained it i was like "umm... oh yeah... we won. sweet"
  3. lololol larry hughes and i can't get over how good rose is already. i never thought he'd be this good this fast.
  4. If Wood, Prior and (half the time) Zambrano hadn't pitched some of the best baseball of their careers simultaneously, it would have been true. But at the time they got Ramirez/Lofton they had already established that the top of their rotation was dominant.
  5. i was reading this just as utah was getting another wide open dunk
  6. They really need this game. No Deron, no Booer, etc.
  7. These Utah announcers are annoying as hell I don't need to hear "BANG!!! HE DRILLED IT!!!!@!%$^%$%#" everytime somebody makes a shot in the 4th quarter
  8. who here wrote off obp? nobody. p.s. leadoff is still not a position. obp is equally important throughout the lineup. highest scoring offense in the league or not, god knows that the main thing we were missing last year was more guys in front of dlee, right?
  9. For 2/18, assuming the guy on WFAN knows what he's talking about http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/
  10. Lilly, DeRosa, Ramirez, Dempster, Reed, Edmonds. You really shouldn't be counting Dempster in there yet He's been a Cub for 5 years. I think he's referring to the coptract he just signed. either way, it still has yet to be determined if he handled dempster well. he's had one good season as a reliever and one good season as a starter. if that one good season as a starter leads to a 4 year contract and he bombs during those 4 years, then he willed have handled it poorly.
  11. but those characteristics are not exclusive or even required i still don't get what this has to do with soriano though.
  12. Lilly, DeRosa, Ramirez, Dempster, Reed, Edmonds. You really shouldn't be counting Dempster in there yet
  13. isn't a hitter's prime like 25-29?
  14. it's impressive because it shows excellent consistency. you know what you're getting every year with aramis
  15. Is there somewhere I can watch the game live online for free?
  16. i know it's poor logic, but that would have never happened if hughes wasnt such a [expletive]
  17. i love watching golden state games when they're at home. their crowds are always electric
  18. Everything that's been written this offseason has said that the Marlins would have to be "blown away" to trde Hermida. They wouldn't do that trade.
  19. So we're trading Zambrano, Lee, and Derosa for salary relief to get Peavy and then we're going to sign Tex for $200 million. #-o #-o #-o Once again, nobody said we should trade all those guys so we could get Peavy. DeRosa and Lee were single ideas and the only person who mentioned Zambrano was pretty much saying it tongue in cheek I'm not so sure that you can speak for other posters. After reading the unbridled passion that some posters have for Peavy, I'm not sure some people wouldn't trade a few of these guys. My point is that this trade is very similar to the Roberts talk last year: we would love to have him, but we don't absolutely need him. That's especially true if you are going to impact the starting lineup or gut the farm system to get him. When posters talk about trading Lee or DeRosa with no clue as to who would replace them, that's irrational. This is a team that won 97 games last year. Show me who is saying that we should trade all those guys. No clue who owuld replace them? Actually it has been discussed pretty openly who would replace those guys. Yet again though, noboy is saying we should trade all those guys. They were individual ideas on trading indivudal players. You're being irrational by saying that people want to trade all of them when in reality nobody is saying that. And yeah, this team won 97 games. That was last year. We're building a team for this year. A lot of things will change. We aren't going to get Edmonds freakish summer production. It's highly unlikely Dempster will have an ERA under 3 again. It's unlikely that DeRosa will put up an .857 OPS, Fontenot will put up a .900+ OPS, etc, etc. A lot can change. Really I'm just worried about the rotation. That might sound ridiculous, but think about it. Harden is pretty much a lock to miss significant time, and what is Dempster goes back to being Dempster? It's very possible. Then where are we? Zambano and a bunch of 4-4.50 ERA starters. That worries me.
  20. So we're trading Zambrano, Lee, and Derosa for salary relief to get Peavy and then we're going to sign Tex for $200 million. #-o #-o #-o Once again, nobody said we should trade all those guys so we could get Peavy. DeRosa and Lee were single ideas and the only person who mentioned Zambrano was pretty much saying it tongue in cheek
  21. Well this thread will always get sidetracked since there's rarely anything new to discuss on the subject.
  22. don't make me talk about monsters and the tooth fairy
  23. Are the Brewers trying tot rade Cameron? If so, why? He had a pretty good year for you guys and from everything I've heard/read he's been great to the city.
×
×
  • Create New...