Jump to content
North Side Baseball

17 Seconds

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    23,757

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by 17 Seconds

  1. 17 Seconds
    And what do you notice about his road numbers? that they've gotten better every year WHICH I TALKED ABOUT IN MY POST just like how i said holliday is probably like a .900 guy in a neutral park if you're not going to read my posts, then don't reply to them and say things that i've already explained. it's pretty simple Since you finally came to your senses I just wanted you to repeat it. finally came to my senses? my stance has been the same since the beginning... that holliday is a good player, but not as good as coors made him look. my point was that i might be willing to move soriano to second for a 1.000 OPS monster, but not for a .900 OPS guy. not once did i say holliday sucks. just that imo he's not good enough to warrant moving soriano to second and dishing out prospects when he's only a rental.
  2. 17 Seconds
    i'm a little slow, so I'm going to try to spell this out. Are you suggesting that looking at road numbers for a guy who played the majority of his road games in huge pitcher's parks like SF, LA, and SD isn't wise if you're not looking to add the game to a team that plays its home games in such a park? Yes, Coors inflates numbers. And the other NLW parks deflate them. Odd to eliminate one outlier and base your analysis entirely on numbers impacted by the other outliers. i'm not going to ignore park factors, but as with the tireless khalil greene debates last year, if you're otherworldly good in half of your at-bats or downright god awful in half of your at-bats that simply can't be ignored or brushed aside fwiw Hollidays hitting .343/.467/.525 over the past month =what's your point? i don't see anyone here denying that holliday is a good player. i already said he was a good hitter, multiple times. it's not my fault you can't tell the difference between "matt holliday is a mediocre hitter who only looked good because of coors" and "matt holliday is a really good hitter, but not as good as his coors inflated numbers made him look"
  3. 17 Seconds
    Meet dextermorgan. nothing of substance yet again. not my fault you don't understand my posts. It's impossible for anyone here to not understand your posts since you pound the same stubbornly simplistic points regarding career numbers and park factors into the ground over and over again regardless of what anyone counters with. god your act is obnoxious. it was proven in the other thread that you don't even read my posts, so it's not a surprise that you're ignoring the fact that career numbers and park factors are a very small part of thew arguments di've made. i'll say it again... either read my posts, or don't respond. i'm sick of you bringing up stuff that i've already responded to over and over and over again
  4. 17 Seconds
    they'd have lost ramirez to free agency by now even if they didn't trade him
  5. 17 Seconds
    I wouldn't exactly call a .896 OPS with RISP "sucking" true, but that's mostly because the small sample size (16 at-bats) makes the one home run inflate his slugging like crazy and because his obp is really good the 3-16 is what i was looking at
  6. 17 Seconds
    His career norms? Bradley has topped an .835 OPS just 3 times in his entire career, and none of those were even full seasons. Actually those 3 "seasons" don't even amount to 2 full seasons worth of at- bats. Bradley was a risk in 3 different areas. He commited 30 mil fully knowing those 3 risks. So far, he's gotten burned. With Dunn there are definite downsides, but you know exactly what you're getting. A poor defender who makes up for it every year with his big bat. The main thing I find funny is that the whole reason he wanted a lefty was to hit RHP, right? Bradley doesn't even hit RHP well. He's just like our righties. He mashes lefties and doesn't do very well against righties. Dunn absolutely destroys RHP.
  7. 17 Seconds
    http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=4238752&name=olney_buster&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fespn%2fblog%2findex%3fentryID%3d4238752%26name%3dolney_buster article on well transition from catcher to pitcher (you dont have to be an espn insider to read it)
  8. 17 Seconds
    http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/parkfactor?season=2009
  9. 17 Seconds
    Baffling suggests that there was absolutely no downside to signing Dunn, which of course there was. Hindsight is of course 20/20, but Jim puts value on defense, and like the above poster said, Dunn is an awful defender that would be moving from LF to RF. So in that respect, its somewhat excusable that he didn't go for Dunn. there is far greater downside to milton bradley than adan dunn and let's not act like jim has assembled some great defending team either
  10. 17 Seconds
    And what do you notice about his road numbers? that they've gotten better every year WHICH I TALKED ABOUT IN MY POST just like how i said holliday is probably like a .900 guy in a neutral park if you're not going to read my posts, then don't reply to them and say things that i've already explained. it's pretty simple
  11. 17 Seconds
    nobody wanted to join a career OPS fantasy league like i suggested it's funny that you kep acting like career ops is what my arument revoles around, when it's not even remotely true.
  12. 17 Seconds
    Meet dextermorgan. nothing of substance yet again. not my fault you don't understand my posts.
  13. 17 Seconds
    maybe you should read my posts. i said i expect him to fnish the season around .835 or so. that's the part i'm not surprised about. i'm surprised that he's been THIS bad, but i except he'll pick it up.
  14. 17 Seconds
    abreu was like the least attractive option IMO. he's an atrocious defender, his numbers weren't really good, and the opnly reason they were evn decent the last couple years were because of the short porch at yankee stadium. his obp has also declined. he was right at like .370 the past 2 seasons, when he used to be well over .400 like every year. .370 isn't bad of course, but when you're a corner outfielder who plays terrible defense and hits for no power at all, it's not enough
  15. 17 Seconds
    on pace means on pace
  16. 17 Seconds
    Who isn't on the Cubs though? aramis
  17. 17 Seconds
    12?
  18. 17 Seconds
    Yeah his first start in MIL. I was thinking it was only a matter of time until he started getting hammered. He wasn't throwing a lot of strikes and he seemed to be giving up a lot of hard hit balls but they were just at guys. But since then he has looked legit, getting ahead, low number of BB, etc. He kind of reminds of Clement when he was here and effective. Getting ahead, low number of BB, not dependent on pure stuff... that doesn't sound even a bit like Matt Clement. yeah, he seems like the opposite actually. clement had really good stuff when he was healthy i miss clement and his chin poof.
  19. 17 Seconds
    well of course he won't remain this good, he's been absolutely ridiculous so far as for santana and guys like that, wells doesn't really have the stuff to be that kind of guy. he'll never be a front of the rotation guy, but if he can keep hitting his spots and mixing speeds well, he could potentially end up being a nice middle of the rotation guy. still though, we're a long way from finding that out. 2 months doesn't really prove anything. let's just hope he keeps this going as long as possible. i will give credit to badnews though. in recent years i've seen him mention that he's a wells fan and thought he was better than his numbers showed
  20. 17 Seconds
    he's developed into an adequate shortstop for sure (overall i mean), especially considering what he's making. i still don't like his defense, but i can live with it as long as he hits like he hit in 08 or 09 it would be tremendous if he could start going to right field again to pump his average back up while still yanking the ball out of the park from time to time
  21. 17 Seconds
    does cyno hate zetterberg for his dive on the crosby slash in game 5?
  22. 17 Seconds
    so he's raking close and/or late, but he's been sucking w/risp
  23. 17 Seconds
    nice of ron van jeremy to throw lee under the bus during the postgame not a surprise that the players don't like him
  24. 17 Seconds
    i hate seeing the lakers win, but i love to see redick make a fool of himself
  25. 17 Seconds
    how do you know it won't make or break this season? all 4 runs yesterday were because we have a third baseman who can't really play third. a single game could cost us the playoffs. it's not like we're talking about giving up key prspects or anything like that. there's no reason that he shouldn't be able to find some scrubby .740 ops guy who can play an adequate 3B, anything is better than what we have. fontenot isk illing us over there.
×
×
  • Create New...