you know exactly what i'm talking about. the people who are incapable of criticizing him when he's clearly in the wrong. it's kind of like the ryan theriot thing. there was/is this line between the people who like him too much, and people who are down on him too much. pretty much anything involving theriot would spark a huge argument where the 2 sides were incapable of meeting. if it was something negative , there would be theriot lovers jumping in immediately and defending him.. even if the criticism was true. then if he did something well, there would be the other side disparaging it immediately. it's the same thing with bradley. there are bradley haters who are determined to make him the bad guy no matter what the situation, while looking away when anybody brings up anything that suggests otherwise. i think the other side is more annoying though. i'm talking about the people who are determined to defend bradley no matter what (these people know who they are). if someone says something that's both negative and innaccurate (which is the case most often) about bradley, these people will jump all over them. but if bradley does something that is actually his fault and warrants critisicm? then they deflect and make a sarcastic joke about how horrible a person he is or something like that. i've been defending bradley pretty hard lately, but to blame his "struggles" on chicago is pretty pathetic.... especially considering it's now ST of the next season.