Jump to content
North Side Baseball

squally1313

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,354

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by squally1313

  1. squally1313
    I don't think their internal budget number is drastically different than the CBT number. But I don't think, if they ran back the Bellinger situation again this February, they'd take an approach of like 'we can offer this much and not a penny more because of CBT'. If they're willing to offer a player $30m, they're probably going to be willing to go to $32 or $33 all in (with the tax) if that's what it takes. Ultimately, Tom's number and the CBT number are very much in the same ballpark and therefore the actual disincentives of the tax (minimal), in my opinion, are never really going to be a main driving factor.
  2. squally1313
    I generally tend to agree with you that overall production matters more than a specific facet of the game but pretty much every offensive roster idea thrown about so far has focused specifically on offensive production (because we have enough glove heavy guys) and picking Seiya as the guy to be replaced means your incremental offensive improvement is minimized. I like Bellinger as a person and he's going to end up having a decent year. But if I'm Hoyer and I don't mind being an horsefeathers, I'm doing everything I can broadcast to people that we are going to be heavily in the market for a big RF bat this year, and that Seiya is our DH, PCA is our CF, and Busch is our first baseman*, and let Bellinger see the writing on the wall. *: There are arguments for bringing back Bellinger as a right/center fielder. There are, in my opinion, no legitimate arguments to bringing him back as the primary first baseman making 30x what Busch does to hit and maybe field worse.
  3. squally1313
    The Bleed Cubbie Blue article I'm reading says that they knew they were very likely going to be over back in February when they signed Bellinger. They then went on to add salary in the Paredes/Morel trade, which they very obviously didn't have to do. Crane Kenney is also quoted as saying 'the CBT is not a governor'. I mean, what specific piece of evidence (them being over, them knowing they were over before the year, them adding salary at the deadline) is pointing towards 'they won't go over in the future'. We can be frustrated conceptually that they likely won't approach a $300m payroll. But in line with the budget that many of us understand it to be ($250m or so), the penalties just don't mean anything and there's no evidence pointing to that being a hard line in the sand.
  4. squally1313
    But why would they care if the penalty is some rounding error? They obviously didn’t this year. Like the only actual piece of evidence we have is them seemingly going slightly over, and Jed candidly talking about it in a way that expresses very little concern about it.
  5. squally1313
    “30% penalty’ doesn’t mean anything in terms of actual financial disincentive. It’s like moving into the next marginal tax rate. The question is always 30% of what, and all indications are the cubs plan will be to stick around that line and therefore it will at worst be some percentage of some low number.
  6. squally1313
    Well Suzuki and Happ are both better hitters than bellinger, so I’m not sure why he automatically gets a spot
  7. squally1313
    Seiya Suzuki is comfortably our best hitter but I guess with Dansby and Happ doing their thing we need to target somebody
  8. squally1313
    I don't know what the mechanics would have been to push them back under once they got to midseason and didn't look like a playoff team. But like, Taillon probably could have gotten traded to save the (minimal) tax penalty. But then you're out a known starter for A. the slim chance you had at the playoffs this year and B. on a go forward basis. I really don't think it was as simple as some excel mistake.
  9. squally1313
    Because he's Bad At His Job, duhhhh
  10. squally1313
    Is it a dick move to cut Smyly at this point in the season?
  11. squally1313
    Sure. Just clarifying that late 2000s Ryan Theriot was an average player, and early 2020s Nico Hoerner is a Good player.
  12. squally1313
    It's not a bad comparison when you look at the pure statistics. Theriot in his career went 281/341/350 and Hoerner is at 276/337/377. But you're looking at pretty different offensive climates. 2008 was Theriot's best fWAR year (3.0) and the league wide OPS was 37 points higher than what it currently is in 2024. That and defense explains why Hoerner has pretty comfortably produced a lot more, WAR wise, then Theriot (4.3/4.6/3.3 the last three years).
  13. squally1313
    Brought it up before but going to repeat my idea of a Paredes centered deal for Tucker. Bregman is a free agent this year, Paredes has 19 home runs this year, would only have 14 expected home runs at Wrigley but would have had 29 if he played every game in Houston. You slot Shaw in at third base and do whatever you can to lock in Tucker long term.
  14. squally1313
    Yeah they certainly could be done playing pretty soon here but at least they're getting paid for (multiple) more seasons. Don't know what the market is for a 35 year old first baseman with a .608 OPS.
  15. squally1313
    Honestly, Rizzo is probably the guy for that, maybe as soon as this offseason. I'm so old.
  16. squally1313
    Let's get through this start without needing serious arm surgery, please
  17. squally1313
    This might be the push I need to drop YTTV and go with just an antenna and the ondemand apps
  18. squally1313
    Out of curiosity, would you take under 105 wRC next year?
  19. squally1313
    I'd add Tucker to the list (and probably agree with everyone else that Soto isn't happening). Mostly agreed that the rest of the free agent bats don't do anything for me. Santander is another Happ/Suzuki, Alonso taking playing time away from Busch or Hoerner is dumb. I'd love to call a trade and extension for one of those guys as our big free agent deal but realistically I know Tucker or Vlad is going to hit free agency. I keep leaving myself with this weird problem of like 'well, we need to spend this money somewhere' like I'm Oscar trying to explain the budget surplus to Michael. The non-Soto free agent bats are just whatever, and the pitching options range from old to very old. Someone like Tucker or Vlad would take up a chunk just from arbitration, but most of the pitching trade targets (attractively) come with a bunch of team control. I liked that Luis Castillo idea?
  20. squally1313
    We need to get to roughly 850 innings from starters next year. You've got Shota, Steele, Taillon, Assad, let's be aggressive and give them 150 a piece, whether or not we want to or should. Need another 250. Brown threw 55 innings this year. Wesneski threw 70. Wicks is going to end up around 70. Horton even less. I mean...Caleb Kilian? Brandon Birdsell? We're just going to hope on basically full year health from our top 4 guys and not even really be able to to push anyone back down to the pen to shore up that need? Go get a good starter.
  21. squally1313
    But the original post was already baking in marginal improvements from having multiple top 100 prospects performing at AAA this year and being ready to take over for the Madrigals and Mastros of the world, and you claiming that wasn't enough to be a playoff caliber offense. We're 11th in offensive fWAR for the whole year and 6th since the ASB. In a 12 team playoff league, that's pretty definitionally a playoff caliber offense. Significant improvements are welcome, of course! But we're going to end up with a full year slightly above average offense and slightly below average pitching staff, and our near-MLB ready farm system is full of bats and very low on healthy pitching. It's pretty obvious to me which side needs more help.
  22. squally1313
    Preseason projections for the Diamondbacks by wRC: Carroll 123 Marte 121 Walker 113 Pederson 113
  23. squally1313
    Cubs: .243/.318/.397 Royals: .253/.310/.416 Cleveland: .238/.309/.395 Braves: .240/.306/.408 Second half numbers are even better. To be fair, there's a huge gap to the elites of the world. But there's a lot of argument for this being a playoff caliber offense right now.
  24. squally1313
    In the second half, the Cubs have been: 6th in wRC/wOBA 1st in baserunning 5th in total offense 5th in defense 4th in offensive fWAR On the pitching side: 21st in K/9 16th in BB/9 20th in HR/9 16th in GB% 11th in ERA 19th in FIP 19th in xFIP 20th in fWAR
  25. squally1313
    If you could count on any of Brown, Wicks, or Horton throwing 100 innings next year, I'd probably lean improving the offense. But realistically that's just not the case. A top 50ish starter, acquired from our surplus of bats, is a much neater upgrade than paying market value for the non-Soto's of the world. Don't count chickens, etc etc, but projecting just 3 fWAR a piece from Dansby/Nico/Happ/Suzuki/PCA, which is mostly conservative, gets you a baseline of 15 fWAR that would have put you 18th in the majors last year just from those 5. Then you factor in Busch, Paredes, maybe Bellinger, non-black hole production at catcher, and that's before the stable of top 100 bats knocking on the door. It's tough to get to an elite level, but it would be tough to get to an elite level without a Soto (or Tucker) level addition and it doesn't seem all the difficult to get to 25 (7th in baseball last year) with what we have. On the pitching side, give me Steele, Shota, and a Mariners starter to go with Taillon as your top four and let one or more of Brown/Wicks/Horton break out in limited stretches next year.
×
×
  • Create New...