So on FS1, they're talking about Fowler being a key to the offense and pointing to his absence as a reason they slumped earlier. Meanwhile, they have a graphic showing 5.1 runs per game with Fowler and 5.2 rpg without him, next to showing the Cubs had a 2.68 ERA with him and 4.22 during the 38 games he was out. I wonder which one of those things mattered more.