OK, here's the scoop. From the day Prior came back from his Giles event (8/5/03), there were three instances where this is true and alll were in consecutive starts. He had 7 runs leads after 6 IP against St. Louis on back-to-back starts 8/26 and 9/1 where he ended up going 8 innings both times (116 and 131 pitches). His next start, he had a 5-1 lead against Milwaukee after 6 IP that he ended up going 7 and 129 pitches. He later had 124-133 pitch games his last 3 starts, but all were close games. Wood only had two scattered such instances. He had one game where he pitched an extra inning against Milwaukee after having a 10-2 lead. He went 122 pitches then. His other game was the game against Cincy where he had a no-hitter going in the 7th with a 6-0 lead. Baker did remove him after the Pena scratch hit and 122 pitches. Every other lengthy start was in a close game. Zambrano had a stretch of 8 out of 10 starts with 110+ pitches from August to mid-September, then was ineffective for his last 2 regular season and all 3 post-season starts. Of these he also had two games where he was overextended with late leads. So, in a nutshell, there is a lot of validity to both arguments. These guys had to go long in most of their starts to get that 1 game Central Division title and that NLDS victory. But, there were several instances where even that bullpen could have saved these guys 30+ pitches - just enough to perhaps keep Prir from closing out Game 6 or Wood from pitching well in Game 7. Thanks for looking that up for us, Sooner. If Prior and Wood had been saved a bit in blowouts, it could have made the difference (especially for Prior).