No, I've read all the posts. I just can't recall Tim being this negative before. Okay that took a moment to sink in...I lumped myself in with WSR on something. OH....MY...GOD. #-o It's been a long week. :) I know I was too dramatic in my phrasing in the initial posts in the thread, but I stand by the logic of what I've said. Starlin is a good player now and is highly likely to be a really good player throughout his prime. But he will need to seriously step up his production down the stretch to avoid having this season be a step backwards offensively. I'm fine with it if that is the cost of adjusting his approach. But until those results are seen his projections have to be taken down a notch from where the were previously. Projection wise, why is an increased walk rate with a low babip a bad thing? I know you feel that the mid season cut off is arbitrary, but honestly the season cutoff mark is kind of arbitrary. If you look at his entire basis of work he had 1400ish straight plate appearances of a being a low walk high contact rate guy. Now hes had 200ish with a significant increase in walk rate while having that low babip. I think if that separation in approaches was between two seasons you wouldn't care and chalk up his crappy start to a season as bad luck bit encouraging because of the walk rate. It happened mid season instead, which isn't odd for high level athletes. Change doesn't have to occur in just the offseason. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk