Jump to content
North Side Baseball

WrigleyField 22

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    19,041

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by WrigleyField 22

  1. WrigleyField 22
    I really respect that we went out and got a defensive coordinator who values turnovers. Sorry, not just value, but shown an ability to coach units who get them. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. WrigleyField 22
    He has gotten some interest before, so if he is successful, we'll probably only have him a year or two. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. WrigleyField 22
    If we wait for Garza proves he is healthy you may lose the hometown deal. Just run a risk/cost analysis (you should have all the medicals) and put an offer. It may bite you, but as long as the contract reflects the risk fairly, just do it. And as alluded, be more concerned with years and trade protection than AAV. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. WrigleyField 22
    He's got a pretty mixed background, but he got his start with Saban. A big thing for me is he seems to value turnovers. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. WrigleyField 22
    Good news, just hope Hoke stays. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. WrigleyField 22
    I'm fine with Hoke. Tucker intrigues me, but honestly, I think if we pass over Hoke for him, he'll probably ask to leave (and Tucker may not want him). So with the choice of Hoke or Tucker I'll take continuity and do my best to replenish the assistants. Ideally I'd bring in Tucker and keep Hoke though. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. WrigleyField 22
    The problem is those so-called "clear talent differences" are completely subjective and not clear at all. Ignoring need is stupid in the NFL. Only if you suck at your job. And granted everyone sucks at some poi t or another, but you should try to suck less than everyone else. Going primarily by need or fit just ends up in reaches. If you have a real need, FA is a much more reliable means anyways. Tge draft is more about playing odds while minimuzing risk. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. WrigleyField 22
    I don't think anyone pretends BPA isn't a fluid discussion, otherwise you could upload rankings and let a computer make the pick. It just means you won't let fit or need override clear talent differences. Especially when comparing across positions, objective analysis can only get you so far. The goal of BPA is to get your rating language consistent across all positions and scouts and put the final ratings through rigourous analysis so your final decision has a small of a pool as possible to choose from. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. WrigleyField 22
    Because the Bears big board doesn't match Kipers or yours or whoever. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. WrigleyField 22
    I think someone thinks Brady Hoke is gonna be our D coordinator. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. WrigleyField 22
    Its upsetting Marinelli chose to leave, but if that was the collateral damage of changing the overall team's direction, than its worth it. It remains to be seen if Trestman will be the correct choice over Arians or a ton of other candidates, but we weren't going to fix the offense with Lovie in charge. The closest Lovie ever got to putting up an offense was a couple years with Turner. Ironically, I just read yesterday, Lovie interviewed Trestman when talks with Terry Shea almost broke down in 04. Bwahahahaha. So maybe we could have had that dream set up with Lovie's cover 2 and Trestman as HC of the offense, but we're 8 years past that now. Lovie never managed to put together an offensive staff and it would have been silly to give him even one more chance. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. WrigleyField 22
    I fail to see any evidence that is the deal with McClellin. He was widely regarded as a late riser around the league. He was high second rounder at minimum by the time the draft rolled around. This wasn't some Jerry Angelo over-reach. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. WrigleyField 22
    In scouring possible names for DC if they don't go with Hoke; Mel Tucker. You have to figure he leaves Jax now and he's led some good defenses in the past. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. WrigleyField 22
    He can do it for a year. If he waits longer than that time will pass him and he'll be a LB coach and wishing he could be DC. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. WrigleyField 22
    Damn, didn't want to see the whole defensive staff torn apart. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  16. WrigleyField 22
    Its a joke that means he hasn't tweeted. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  17. WrigleyField 22
    Well if it happens, Jon Hoke for DC. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  18. WrigleyField 22
    The younger one. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  19. WrigleyField 22
    This just in: Trestman says nice things about guy who's draft stock he was hired to help. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  20. WrigleyField 22
    This is what i read on another board: Trestman was with Seifert, then Seifert got fired. He was with Bill Callahan, then Callahan got fired. He was with Dave McGinnis, then McGinnis got fired. Assistants live a vagabond lifestyle. Longevity of stay is not the norm - it's the reason Trestman went to the CFL. So at least some instances of him moving on when a new HC comes in. Maybe if you looked further some other moves were upgrades. And there have been results offensively, no matter what decision makers decide about him. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  21. WrigleyField 22
    Emery is an info junkie. He'll pick Treatman's brain about players and get tons of feedback. When its decision time, it will be Emery's to make. But Emery will obviously be influenced after picking his brain, just as he will be influenced by scouts. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  22. WrigleyField 22
    The Bears are going to have to offer serious extensions to the staff they want to keep on. There has to be payback for forcing them to avoid interviews these past few weeks. I'd offer a serious extension to Marinelli and the DB coach. If Babich wants to force his way out thats fine. Not sure about anyone else, but the DB coach is the only guy I've ever heard about being a candidate for promotion, although if there was an actual opportunity for a DC promotion I'm sure Emery would have let him go, and still would. If Marinelli stays it shouldn't matter too much for the other D coaches. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  23. WrigleyField 22
    That won't happen. I was kidding. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  24. WrigleyField 22
    If Marinelli doesn't stay the Bears should hire Lovie as DC. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  25. WrigleyField 22
    I'm liking it less and less. The west coast offense's time has passed. Trestman is going to struggle to get the respect of players and other coaches with his very poor resume. Much like Lovie's first coaching staff with the Bears, that was filled with a bunch of college coaches, I am very concerned about having a GM with very little NFL experience hiring a coach with minimal NFL experience that has gone stale. What he did in the mid-90's is not going to fly in 2012. Trestman is going to have to spend months reteaching himself the league. He hasn't seen an NFL talent in practice in 8 years, and that was with a pathetic Dave Wanndstedt team in Miami. What kind of offense do the Packers run? It sure as [expletive] isn't the mid-90's west coast that Trestman is used to. Good thing its minimal experience. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...