Jump to content
North Side Baseball

WrigleyField 22

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    19,041
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by WrigleyField 22

  1. The most nondescript big market team in the NFL by a mile Hey, the Jets want a word about that.
  2. Probably depends on how they do it.
  3. funny? like our frame of reference is suddenly back where it should be for any nfl team. back then i might've been excited about that WR who had an OK year this year for us who i can't even name. Uh, I wouldn't say "for any other NFL team" just the Bears of the aughts.
  4. Woww.... that is not the deal I was expecting with 4 teams in on him...
  5. exactly but they will probably brown it up by starting him instead of drafting a guy Stealth tank for Darnold.
  6. Browns getting a second rounder and Osweiler from Texans. Nice move, they couldn't spend all 99M anyways.
  7. Eh FA is usually fools gold anyways. The only thing that really matters is the W-L record. Don't get me wrong, I'll hold an opinion on the moves, but Pace basically has one metric from me that matters going forward.
  8. Watching this NFL Network coverage; "Alright Ian, you have any other bombshells for us?" Ian: "Yea how about Nick Fairley signing a 4 year deal with the New Orleans Saints" "I didn't actually expect you to have more!" Ian: "You want to hear more?" "Well, I do, but we have an 8 hour show to run here" Ian: http://i.imgur.com/seh6p.gif lol
  9. Likely "mystery team" imo
  10. I'm not saying he's not, but that second best safety has a PFF grade equal to the CB that is getting 5/70 from the Pats. I'm not sure who is ultimately better between Jones Quartey and Amos...
  11. He has like 4 dozen tweets in the last hour and a few mention Jay, lol.
  12. FWIW Hope he can come up with 6 picks again... he does have 18 on his career.
  13. Its okay if it doesn't preclude us from still pursuing younger impact safeties too, IMO.
  14. Yea... basically a repeat of Antrelle Rolle. Hope this works out better
  15. Kind of depends how its structured. I hope most of that guarantee is a 2017 roster bonus instead of a signing bonus.
  16. I'm very unproductive today.
  17. Stills staying in MIA for 4/32, with 20m guaranteed. I think that's a good sign from the Bears POV for Alshon's market, right?
  18. I won't get that specific, I think you can widen the list of acceptable CB and WR, but that would then be predicated on finding upgrades at other spots on the roster, as you'd likely be spending less.
  19. FWIW - sounds like Gilmore's deal is 5/70. Considering he is staying in division and going to the reigning champs, I imagine the Bears would have had to significantly beat that offer. Not sure Gilmore would be worth that cost. There are still some good CBs on the market, including Logan Ryan who the Pats won't be brigning back now (and I wonder if they can even retain Malcolm Butler). And I guess they aren't out at Bouye yet. Titans frontrunner, but Bears have $13/m offer out ... https://twitter.com/AllbrightNFL/status/839840974893375488
  20. Well neither of us knows either way, :dontknow: Well you did bring up Glennon at the start of this discussion, but fine, I understand the point is more about the lack of D players committed right now. Either way, its incredibly early to say the Bears aren't bringing in top D talent. Unfortunately the very best defenders who are REALLY worth blowing your load on were tagged. As it is now, we could conceivably do just as well for ourselves in FA on the third tier guys on day 3 and 4 verse the tier 2 guys on days 1 and 2.
  21. Well winning with a dominant D I think would be true with Cutler too, so thats a cash/cost wash. I do like Cutler better, but I'm not sure that difference is enough to have strong opinions on. So they are in the same predicament had they done what I would do and kept Cutler. THE POINT IS THEY ARE MISSING OUT ON TOP DEFENSIVE PLAYERS while committing to Glennon. They didnt miss out on those guys because of Glennon though. And theres still other guys to get (and draft, which will be critical to building a dominant D)
  22. I mean, thats the case until we draft the rare franchise QB, right? But the point is they are pursuing the strategy of running a handcuffed offense. It's one thing to actually try and field an offense that can score points and failing because you got the wrong QB. But when you give a QB $15m/year, knowing he's not going to be putting up points, your strategy is to win with defense. In order to do that you need a defense that can win you games and the Bears aren't doing that either. Well winning with a dominant D I think would be true with Cutler too, so thats a cash/cost wash. I do like Cutler better, but I'm not sure that difference is enough to have strong opinions on. So they are in the same predicament had they done what I would do and kept Cutler.
  23. Its not great, but thats FA for you. The saving grace is the strength of the position in the draft.
  24. I mean, thats the case until we draft the rare franchise QB, right?
  25. Waiting for guarantee and structure details. Hopefully that leaks shortly after FA opens.
×
×
  • Create New...