The way people have generally used it, its a trait. That just doesn't make any sense to me. Guys starting for 2+ years is how you get a lot of tape and a lot of confidence in your judgement of that tape. I'm not knocking him for only 13 games, I'm doubting highly how this front office could be that in love to make that trade for him with such limited data. Its the Parcell example. He must be a senior He must be a graduate He must be a three-year starter He must have at least 23 wins I read that and it reads like a trait. Anytime that its brought up, people use it like a trait to draw a historical profile to make a prediction on the outcome of the player, and basically say, well only one great QB has ever had so few college starts, so he doesn't meet the profile of franchise QB. What you're describing is a legitimate concern, which is uncertainty. But to the original question, if thats the biggest knock and everyhting else is really positive, are you just obsessing over that one knock? Or is there another big knock on Trubisky outside of that and not running a pro offense (like most college QBs)