WrigleyField 22
-
Posts
19,067 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by WrigleyField 22
-
Hope everyone followed my Eagles ML and made big bucks tonight.
-
Put ball pit balls in front of the 19 month old. Red and Green. She only wanted the Green. Eagles ML.
-
Yea I saw cancer, but sounded like it was pretty recently diagnosed. May have been a fairly quick timeline.
-
RIP. 2001 was fun. Seemed like a legitimately well liked as a coach by his players. Sounds like it may have been pretty sudden too.
-
With the chance to put a real secretary on the board, sky is the limit
-
It's possible selling is just part of plan, but yea, they've had plenty of notice here, and they've been making some big investments along way. It's not like they'll be forced to sell. NFL has also revised a few different rules in past couple years to allow for more diluted ownership structures.
-
2024-25 Chicago Bulls Regular Season Thread
WrigleyField 22 replied to Outshined_One's topic in Other Sports
I mean it's not even MLE money. Vet leadership (no matter what route they're going) -
Logically the biggest thing with age is the body slowing down. The thing is there is tons of player tracking data that can tell you in real terms and live how players are slowing down or not. Supposedly the reason the Rams are moving in from Kupp is for this reason (and they've long been a leader in player tracking data). Granted you'll have better data on your own guys (practice data), but this is probably a fairly cutting edge analytics thing. Someone out there can probably do some real time data stuff with Garrett to make better predictions on aging than just looking at a calendar (and as the data accumulates would be able to predict these aging curves with more accuracy). It seems like Garret would profile positively to guys with body types and athleticism that allows for good aging. But making a qualitative assessment on that would be better.
-
Chicken or Egg doesn't really matter. Except for extreme circumstances you should be acting like a team who can win, but not a team destined to win. So ever thinking your window is so immediate that you're reckless is as silly as thinking your window is years away. Both overstate anyone's predictive abilities on these things. https://www.nfl.com/news/philadelphia-s-superpower-eagles-became-nfc-s-best-team-through-furious-fearless-roster-renovation?campaign This article is full of good quotes, but I think a great summary is basically "this stuff is kind of hard but the easiest thing is to just try". Trying to line up windows is 100% wasted energy trying to analyze your window.
-
Incidentally I was just making this point on my Twitter account today. Eagles at end of 2020 were a closed window team by conventional wisdom. They were projected 70m over the cap. 4 win season. And they "didn't have a QB". Except they did have a QB. Minny this year let go of their franchise QB and their new 1st round QB got injured. And yet they still ended up "having a QB". SF busted on their new QB a few years ago and wait for it.... Still had a QB! So no the have a QB thing isn't really even a pre-requisite. Just loser talk mostly.
-
Windows are a myth
-
I'd talk myself into #10 straight up for Garrett but that's also probably dumb. But definitely can't be making a multi-pick investment in a trade like that. Really the Mack trade was something like #24 net value and I think only a one pick loss. Garrett is better than Mack at time, but also 3 years older. Just to put that into context. I also think Cleveland's top instinct is gonna be to smooth it over. Money and years can go a long way to resolving these type of requests.
-
Eh, all evidence of the past decade has not been them being overly cheap. I mean you can nit pick certain things, but there's also plenty of evidence of them spending lots (whether on teams, coaches, or operations/facilities) through the past decade+. Just because they weren't making the most expensive move every time doesn't mean they were cheap. Fox/Fangio/Gase staff was surely expensive. HH renos a huge expense. Arlington a huge expense. Nagy I don't think was cheap and again paid up big to keep Fangio. Plenty of big deals and big offseasons in player spending. Eberflus was inexpensive, but reportedly Quinn was a finalist and would surely have been fairly expensive and all signs point to Poles just preferring Flus. But yea now we can definitely put it to rest
-
NFL Coach carousel thread (non Bears)
WrigleyField 22 replied to WrigleyField 22's topic in Other Sports
Hes good. Very good might be a stretch honestly. High floor, but probably low ceiling. -
2024-25 Chicago Bulls Regular Season Thread
WrigleyField 22 replied to Outshined_One's topic in Other Sports
He was worth it if you were getting picks attached. Zach should be traded for picks but you're gonna have to take back a matching contracts and it's not likely it will be like all expiring matching contracts. -
NFL Coach carousel thread (non Bears)
WrigleyField 22 replied to WrigleyField 22's topic in Other Sports
Loomis is basically a GM of old, when it leaned as heavily toward business side of things. His resume through ~1999 was basically a carbon copy of Ted Phillips. But yea he's always relied on his coaches and personnel guys a lot. He just manages its... generally...? Hes also a legit cap manipulation genius. I mean people are often critical of his cap decisions but he's basically a trailblazer in many areas of cap management that other teams try to often copy (and often fail at replicating). But the personnel decisions attached to the cap maneuvering has faltered a lot. And he's also been very anti-draft building (they by far have made the least picks and least comp picks during his reign). They could do a lot worse, IMO. Although I don't know if hell ever build another SB winner, he certainly isn't a bad GM either (accepting that no GM role currently looks like his - closest being Roseman). I think more teams should try the budiness/cap GM route. But it defaults to specialized personnel/scout role almost always. -
I think it's really underrated how much of the Oline woes was coach and scheme related. Yes they needed some more talent and ideally if you replace Jenkins with someone like Smith with better health reliability (knock on wood) it will help with cohesion and not dipping down as far into depth. But even when they had their top 5 it looked a lot worse than the sum of its parts I think. Really hope Johnson has a plan and a OL coach lined up to maximize it the scheme and talent. And teach the concepts like how to block a stunt lol
-
Dang I was almost gonna say 49ers along with Buccs. Cardinals only once as a crossover seems crazy. Seahawks wasn't a bad guess. Basically knew East would be jumbled because that division is always jumbled in standings. Though only twice for Cowboys a little surprising.
-
NFC most I'd guess Buccaneers. Least... Seahawks?
-
Bland and Diggs have had All Pro years while he was DB Coach and Lewis was probably a Pro Bowl snub this year (299 yards on 57 targets 39 completions against). They like the coaches when there are good players for that coach's unit for sure.
-
Did he?
-
Hilarious. Just no good options for them in how to proceed. Their AGM just runs the search as interim now? Throwback to when Khan said he could fire Baalke if someone gave him good reason (while Baalke was right there)
-
Nor likely anyone else from the offensive staff sounds like. Even though Johnson is pretty young, he's been exposed to at least 4 pro staffs each from non related "trees". Hopefully that rolodex goes deep.
-
Hope that means no.
-
Wave 2-3 guys are gonna still be starters and quality swing guys on OL. Of course some vet min flyers too. May include Shelton resigning as one of those guys as Center market doesn't look deep. I do think the talent level of the players isn't as wide of a gap as some people think though too. A lot of the truely terrible plays were obvious scheme breakdowns. Better coaching elevates a ton. Wonder if Ben has something to say about load management and the constant nagging injuries some of our OL seemed to have... He made an interesting comment about practicing with intent and then getting feet up at the PC.
