Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Transmogrified Tiger

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    38,765
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Transmogrified Tiger

  1. Only 60 votes? Plenty of people left to push Felix up to his rightful spot.
  2. Murton is a possible LF solution, whether that's full time or a platoon. Cedeno should be a backup middle infielder now that we are guaranteeing Izturis SS. Pagan is a good candidate for a backup OF spot, I wouldn't want to count on him to be part of a platoon. Marshall, Marmol, Hill: IMO 2 of these 3 should be in the rotation, the other probably should be dealt. Hill especially should be dealt if he gets left off. Guzman is insurance in the rotation, I've liked him for a bullpen role for some time. Mateo goes to AAA. O'Malley is hopefully never heard from again. Theriot could be in the mix for a backup IF spot. Can't have him and Cedeno on the same team though.
  3. At this rate Felix might be at a .780 OPS by morning.
  4. Has been just about all year I believe, and he is tonight. Pie adds a walk in his second PA. EPatt is 0 for 1 with a walk.
  5. Is NSBB saying they'd rather have Veal or Gallagher? Considering age, production, position and tools Pie is the clear winner. It's more of a reward for the best season than a best prospect evaluation.
  6. Again, Theriot has no power, but I see an OBP over .350 both of those years, compared to Cedeno's abysmal .270. And Theriot has been a better basestealer too, no? (Sorry, can't find his minor league SB stats) If you sent Cedeno down to AA I think you'd see him put up pretty good overall production. Even moreso if you started him at Peoria. But that's not the point. What I'm getting at is overall, Cedeno is the better asset, but Theriot fits our immediate needs better. Theriot in his minor league career was 115 for 154 in stolen bases, 74.6%. He seems to have alternated between real good and real bad in different seasons.
  7. About bloody time. Wonder what this does to minorleaguesplits.com. And for a positional player, Felix Pie
  8. When Theriot was as old as Cedeno is this year, he split the year between Lansing(.259/.353/.318/.671) and West Tennessee(.236/.351/.270/.621). Cedeno is(or should be viewed as) the more valuable commodity. However, for the purposes of being a middle infielder, Theriot being more advanced works to his advantage, so hopefully someone will see Cedeno's big helping of tools and potential and he can help bring in a more valuable player.
  9. "On base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on base percentage.....the problem we have to address more than anything is the home run problem" If it weren't for my horse, if it weren't for my horse...
  10. I'm setting a 90% probability that postgame discussion is dominated by Dusty leaving in Z too long, especially considering the game situation. wtg hitters though
  11. Is he injured? ETA: I realize you meant his roster situation and that he's unlikely to get the roster nod, but I was wondering because I hadn't heard either way. I have to think something's wrong with him. He was out of the lineup for several days, and then EPatt got promoted.
  12. Poor Mike Fontenot
  13. Didn't need to be converted. Shh, I prefer to think my rants and raves are actually listened to.
  14. The obscene year not likely to repeat theory is the same with Soriano, no? Yep, although at least in that case you don't have to pay in players to get him. True, but if you go after Soriano, you have to give up prolly 2 draft picks, plus, IDK considering his agent, prolly have to give about $14-16 mill for five yrs. So, IMO, in the long run it is more expensive to go after Soriano then Wells, and their games isn't the far off. I'm not quite sure how the draft pick compensation would work. Remember that we would only be giving up one pick, because the extra sandwich pick isn't ours to begin with. And this year our first rounder is protected, lowering the value of that tradeoff.
  15. Well that's one convert to the Pie camp. You all should be ashamed of yourselves.
  16. Where'd you get the numbers? That's good stuff. Unfortunately, those percentages don't bode well for Harvey. In general, a player's BABIP should be roughly 110 points over their LD %(not an absolute by any sense, but a guideline. For example, speedy players often outperform their expected BABIP). Even in his hot months Harvey doesn't seem to be hitting all that many line drives(with an expected BABIP well under .300). On the plus side, his April-June LD% are so low it's scary, and hopefully flukish.
  17. The obscene year not likely to repeat theory is the same with Soriano, no? Yep, although at least in that case you don't have to pay in players to get him.
  18. Join. I'm weary of him too, but I'd still rather have Soriano than Lee. What about Vernon Wells? Vernon has made no secret that he is planning to leave Toronto after the 2007 season. I mean over the career, Soriano has posted a .280/.320/.500 season for his career, whereas Wells has posted .285/.330/..481. And Wells is regarded as one of the better defensive CFers in the game, whereas scouts/GMs acknowledge the fact that Soriano can play the position, just not as weel considering his athlethicism. Wells isn't that great in CF. He's a bit above average, but nothing special. Overall he's a good player, but acquiring him now means you're paying (players and dollars) for his obscene year that he's not likely to repeat (consistently at least). Not a very good allocation of resources IMO, especially considering Pie.
  19. I dare you to make your pick IMB!
  20. This is exactly the point. If the peripherals don't show any change, then yes, it is the same as Neifi going through a hot streak. Maybe it means he's showing a little better ability to hit for average(too bad we don't have access to type of batted ball data, BK?), but as it pertains to Harvey, he'd need a lot more than that to compensate for his still poor plate discipline. Do you really think Harvey is going to become a .300 level hitter(or to word it without an arbitrary number, be significantly better at hitting for average) because of this adjustment? If you do, then we're just going to fundamentally disagree. Otherwise we're arguing a matter of degrees that he's going to improve without any changes in his BB's and K's.
  21. I don't think you're reading carefully if you think people are looking for negative all the time, especially when it comes to prospects and the posters who consistently post about them. You're putting words in my mouth. I never said anything was an absolute. The peripherals I'm talking about are his plate discipline, walks and K's. That's the stuff that needs improvement, with or without fluctuation in BABIP. Like I said, he's been better in August and he's also had the report of a shorter swing, so maybe he'll be able to build upon that. If he doesn't, then it's not going to matter that he has a shorter swing if he continues to avoid walks and K at that rate. Unless those peripherals improve, then Harvey needs to be a .300+ hitter at the major league level in order to be a worthwhile corner OF. That's where the BABIP comes in, because in all likelihood he's not going to be able to do that.
×
×
  • Create New...