If you want to defend the baseball side of the decision, sure. But claiming that non-tendering an arb eligible player who had accepted a punishment would somehow create blowback that the player was being mistreated is laughable. Are you saying Russell/Boras would lose a grievance? I completely disagree, with the obvious IANAL caveat. It'd be a slam dunk that it was punitive for the DV and above and beyond the collectively bargained punishment he accepted. Just to be 100% clear since there's a lot of reflexive reactions to this, there are zero circumstances in which I want Russell on the 2019 roster. I also understand that until they actually trade him they're in a difficult spot because of the CBA, whether they truly want to act on it or not. Given their history I don't begrudge people for thinking they're giving lip service to Russell's treatment, but you can also make the argument that it shows at least some sensitivity to the situation and if the details are true, are as much as you could hope to see in terms of actually trying to get Russell help. Especially since there are no obvious or perfect solutions on how teams and leagues should act to actually deter future domestic violence.