I'm curious why you think Hudson is that much better than Zito. Career numbers: Hudson: WHIP 1.24, ERA 3.33, 6.37 K/9, 0.7 HR/9, 2.27 K/BB, .688 W%, 30 years old, righty, 34+ starts in three of last five years Zito: WHIP 1.22, ERA 3.50, 7.03 K/9, 0.9 HR/9, 2.05 K/BB, .611 W% 27 years old, lefty, 5 straight years of 34+ starts Outside of the winning percentage, the numbers are very similar and Zito is younger, a lefty, and has no history of recent health problems. Plus, the price market for pitching has inflated from even last year...Zito won't be cheap. Zito's career numbers are a bit misleading. To be quick, look at their ERA+ numbers: Zito: 00: 174 01: 125 02: 169 03: 129 04: 105 05: 116 Hudson 99: 149 00: 114 01: 129 02: 156 03: 158 04: 133 05: 125 As you can see, Zito's career numbers are skewed from his earlier success, while Hudson has been more consistent.