Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Transmogrified Tiger

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    38,761
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Transmogrified Tiger

  1. Very difficult to isolate with starting pitchers because of fatigue. Very difficult to isolate with relievers because of sample size.
  2. You don't need to use the emergency catcher if both are playing. Assuming Barrett is at first and Blanco gets hurt, you just move Barrett behind the plate and put someone else at 1B(Mabry/Restovich/Walker).
  3. With Lee gone, we really can't afford Blanco catching more than once every 2 times through the rotation or so. Our lineup with those two switched out is laughably awful.
  4. Going into today's game, he was 21st of 24 in OBP(Duffy, Reyes and Pods were worse), and 20th in OPS(Duffy, Pods, Furcal, and Brady Clark were worse).
  5. Seconded. Thirded Fourth-ed I agree, but the gap in talent closes significantly when you think about their service times and impending FA. For the record, Cabrera has 2+ years service time, while Wright has 1+. If Wright is a super-two(I don't think that's likely, but I can't be sure) then they'll be on the same track to Free Agency.
  6. So, were we just wrong about Gallagher starting today?
  7. Big day for Chirinos. Perhaps he's deserving to go to Daytona? I don't know much about Salas, can someone fill me in on him. He looks old for Daytona and is repeating.
  8. Nothing, I've already said it was in the context of the talks for him to get an extension. I'd like to see him show 2005 was a fluke, and thus far he hasn't done anything to ease my concerns. I don't have any links off hand, but Pierre isn't a very good at tracking balls in addition to his T-Rex throws. His speed helps compensate for that some, but he's still below average. Numerically, Pierre has a career 97 rate from BP(hasn't been over 95 since his Colorado days), and PMR has him ever so slightly above or below average depending on the differences in the model.
  9. I wouldn't give him an extension either. I was against getting him for the price we paid. However, statements like "Pierre has been terrible as a cub" and saying pierre's D has been crappy are statements that comment on a guy's performance (and I argue are false statements). Those claims stand alone. How do you undermine the main argument (extending Pierre)? Take out the supporting ones. I fail to see why you guys are having such an issue with this. Is Pierre an offensive stud OPS-wise? Of course not. Prototypical leadoff hitters usually aren't, but that's the old school vs. the new school clash. I don't agree with it, but it's the methodology this organization is going to follow. It makes more sense to me to stick Youkilis in the leadoff spot than Pierre, but JH didn't ask me. We have to do the best we can with the mindset the front office has - and that's Pierre. Pierre has been terrible as a Cub. Don't even use OPS, he has been awful at getting on base. He's always been considered a below average defender(I'm not the one who made the original statement about this year, I haven't noticed much good or bad besides his little league arm).
  10. We drafted a guy in the 6th round who couldn't put up a .780 OPS in college?
  11. Is this really that difficult a point to understand? Pierre was bad last year, he had a poor OBP(especially for a leadoff hitter), and he didn't hit for any power(which is the norm for him). Some say he was bothered by injuries that kept down his performance, or that it was a fluke down season(like Pat Burrell). That's fine, and it very well may be true. This year to date, he's been even worse, although it's not nearly as many at bats. All anyone has said is that it's premature to talk about giving him a contract extension when he's coming off a down year and has continued in that downward direction to start this year. No one's saying that he'll continue to be this bad.
  12. That's an overstatement. He has been bad, not terrible. Semantics anyway, but his .282/.301/.352/.653 line is terrible. Not a single qualified player put up a worse OPS last year, and he's currently near the bottom of that list this year(around 160th of 195).
  13. No one is talking about long term extensions for Cedeno, Murton, and Ramirez. Where has anyone been unreasonable about Pierre in this thread?
  14. Koronka was not good as a Cub, he was behind multiple other players for a call up, and he may have been out of options too(don't remember). If he does well somewhere else then great for him, but it's not worth kicking yourself over if he has some success.
  15. So? Aramis Ramirez has been awful so far. And I don't anyone expects him to continue at this pace. It's only a question of when he turns it up, not if. I would argue the same for Pierre. Pierre was similarly awful last year(although not this abominably bad at getting on base), there certainly is a question if he's going to "turn it up".
  16. Pierre has been terrible so far as a Cub.
  17. He put it to the left side, but it was a sac approach.
  18. I haven't seen a game in several days, but Pierre looks about 6 inches shorter than I remember.
  19. INTERFERENCE ON WALKER, BARRETT OUT No, Barrett would not have been out.
  20. Stop. Sending. Down. Pitchers. After. One. Bad. Outing.
  21. Intervention....seriously...you neeeed help. You have to admit that's just more fun than saying "I'd prefer Dmitri Young".
×
×
  • Create New...