Jump to content
North Side Baseball

raw

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    5,710
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by raw

  1. I have watched all the "breakdowns" of unbiased sources. And man, a lot of this just seems like practice issues. Like I know people were freaking out unnecessarily about players missing time in camp, but part of it has some merit. It looked like linemen were failing to correctly pass defenders off to the OL next to them. And obviously, Davis missed a ton of time, Patrick missed a bunch of time, Whitehair missed time and then moved to another position to play next to a C that wasn't really practicing either. Then you had WRs in the wrong place at time or I'm assuming so, because there were guys in the same place. And again, you had Claypool not practicing for a while. I am kinda worried about Fields turning down open passes. I feel like he's feeling the rush and taking his eyes down. JT mentioned his drop seems lazy. I think he's concentrating on footwork a bit too much instead of just playing ball. He just seems kind of robotic. And I think there is something to the overcorrecting. You preach footwork, not taking hits and checking down and you get a QB that is focusing on those things until they become second nature to him. But I do think his pocket presence looked better, FWIW. And not to blame anyone else, but I hope Fields isn't being coddled in the film and in practice and on the sidelines. He needs to know where the ball needs to go, and more importantly when it needs to get there. He needs to play with urgency.
  2. Kmet is a fine player. I'm good with the team paying him, what they did (it's an overpay, but that's how it works). But they have 3 WRs who should be better options in the pass game, and maybe even Scott will be as well. They need to stop with the TE screens. They need to stop with the iso routes 1-on-1 vs a DB, like the endzone back shoulder attempt on the 1st drive. That was all fine and good last year, when you had no WRs, but now that you added talent, Kmet should be used to chip block before running out on a delayed route and/or be a checkdown option unless you create the misdirection stuff for him like many of the TDs last year (this also is in the delayed route category).
  3. I actually agree with every word of this, except the Kmet part. He's whatever. They need to stop using him like he's an actual pass game weapon and not a checkdown option.
  4. Which is fine, but also not the point. The point is, those top 65 picks are more talented than the UDFAs they had last year, who aren't even on 53 man rosters this year. And they kept Justin Jones the same. And upgraded from a 4th rounder who has never lived up to his predraft hype to a former 4th rounder who is coming off a career year in 2022. The interior DL is better than last year. It's just a fact. That doesn't mean it's good, just means what you said is wrong or hyperbole.
  5. The disrespect for the team that crushed.....checks notes.....Indiana St last week!
  6. To only comment on 1 sentence of this....this isn't even the worst DL in the last 10 months. LOL They replaced Armon Watts (former UDFA), Mike Pennel (UDFA), and Angelo Blackson (4th round) with a pair of top 65 picks and a guy who's been a productive NFL player before unlike the 3 they lost.
  7. Tampa defense is good. Tampa offense is bad. Bears defense is bad. Bears offense is bad. I do think there will be a concerted effort to stick to the run game more and to get the ball to playmakers early and often. Kyler Gordon is out for 1/2 the season with a broken hand, while Chase Claypool is fully healthy, so that's fun.
  8. Not if you get off the bus running.
  9. Tim Jenkins posted a video breaking down 11 plays. There was a run play or two, but of the pass plays, there were 2-3 Fields didn't throw to open people down the field. There were a couple Jenkins didn't know what the hell the play was (redzone play Van Ness made). And there was 1 CB blitz where it looks like Fields sees it but the WR doesn't make an adjustment and runs right into coverage, and Fields takes off. There's also a fun video of all of Chase Claypool's missed blocks and lazy routes when he knew he wasn't getting the ball. They probably have to cut their losses with this dude, yikes!
  10. Roschon Johnson runs hard. The CBs were mostly OK.
  11. Nah. They let him throw down the field last year.....when they let him throw at all. But they were ultimately justified not letting him throw too much because there was nobody to protect him or catch the ball from him. I'm really not all that upset about the INT. Granted, he did every bad thing a QB can do (stare down a WR, throw late over the middle of the field, not see underneath coverage in zone), but he tends to only do those things in garbage time. Six of his 11 INTs last year were when they were down by a TD or more in the last 4 minutes of a game. That wasn't last 4 minutes, but obviously the game was over before that throw.
  12. Agreed. But that's the thing that happens when you "punt" a whole season. I get the justification for NOT drafting Carter. You don't have the lockeroom/system in place for that guy to thrive without the pressure of being the best player on the defense. But nobody forced them to be in that position. Poles had every chance to put his team in position where they A) weren't desperate for a RT because he didn't address the position for 2 FA cycles or B) had defensive leadership and talent to make Carter a possibility. On a side note, I've seen people all offseason talking about how the Bears DTs are set with the 2 rookies because they will get better. But neither of them projects to be the dominant 3T, like Carter, that this defense needs. Even if Wright, Jones, and healthy Jenkins get it together this year and the back 7 on D step up, DT is still a big enough need to take a guy in the 1st round. Plus, they lose Billings and Jones (maybe already lost Jones, did anyone see him yesterday?) this offseason.
  13. Eh. I couldn't care less about any of this. The only reason to go fast late in the game when it was over, was if you felt Fields was more comfortable going faster. They can't use the excuse that 2-minute offense needs to be practiced, when they had a change to practice things in the preseason and refused to for competitive advantage or whatever. They had a chance to in the 1st half but played scared (granted, they were also backed up in their own end).
  14. People have argued before that he couldn't go thru progressions. Or if he could, he couldn't go thru them fast enough. I agree with you that he's always had trouble with pulling the trigger with anticipation. So, I wasn't thinking of that as "processing" necessarily, but yeah it's part of it. But he has seemed to be able to anticipate on vertical routes or "moving" routes. Like the slant to DJ, the fade TD to Mooney.
  15. I watched all the drop backs on an all-22 video someone put together. And I don't think Fields' problem is reading the defense, per se. It's all about anticipation to me. There were some plays there if he would just grip it and rip it. Maybe that is part of processing, not seeing it quick enough, but he's looking right at WRs right as they gain leverage and are clearly about to be open for a long enough window to throw cleanly into. He seems to be too worried about what will happen if the WR isn't ready. He's gotta trust his guys, especially DJ, who is a great WR and Claypool who is a big enough target that he should be able to prevent any INTs with his size. But again, there were a lot of guys just not open. Route concepts were bad. Curls against tight man coverage. Crossers running into zone defenders. There were more vertical routes than I expected to see, but a LOT of them are decoys, guys not looking for the ball just running defenders off to try to open up the guy underneath. These things are never just 1 person at fault. For all we heard about Fields being more comfortable in the offense in Year 2.....he didn't look comfortable in the offense. IDK if it was because the gameplan wasn't geared to fit his strengths or if it only looked good because they were practicing against a crap defense all camp or whether they've been blowing smoke up our asses for 3 months.
  16. Off the top of my head, the only other game they looked completely unready and unenthusiastic to play was the Detroit game late in the year. And that was deep into full-on tank mode. There's plenty of reasons to have issues with Flus, getting the team ready shouldn't be one of them.
  17. Agree with this. It will be obvious. What won't be is if Poles is capable of finding the guy that is, if Fields isn't and if Flus and co. are capable of coaching the guy that is. Fields not making it, undoubtedly, will lead to another: Pace, Nagy, Trubisky or Emery, Trestman, Cutler or Angelo, Lovie, Grossman, or Hatley, Jauron, McNown.
  18. Yes, which is exactly what I'm saying. *Yall was just a general thing, not you specifically.
  19. Ok. Then who is that on? And for the record, I'm not absolving Fields of anything. I said he was bad. I said all-22 probably shows guys open down the field. I also said he wasn't good enough last year. But most normal teams help their QBs more than the Bears have the last 3 to 115 years. The OL isn't good enough. The WRs weren't good enough last year. The playcalling wasn't good enough today (it was probably good enough last year). Fields may very well be not good. But all I want to know is definitely if it's him or if it's everything around him. Jordan Love probably still isn't any good (made 1 completion in tight coverage), but GB, knowing his WRs are young and maybe not that great, surrounded him with a great OL. Granted, the OL was already there when he took over, but we still don't know if our GM knows how to GM, our coaches know how to coach, so obviously we aren't going to know if our QB knows how to QB.
  20. I mean, yall complained last year he wasn't checking down enough and looking to run and took too many sacks. Obviously, we all want a happy medium but Fields stated that this was the gameplan in the tweet I posted.
  21. And you assume he checked down because he's incapable of the only thing he did well last year, throwing wise? You really don't want to know what you are the ultimate guy of
  22. Better QBs definitely would have chosen to simply throw like 8 of those 14 called screen passes down the field. I mean, you can say the issue is they don't trust Fields to throw the ball down the field more (in which case, it's an even bigger indictment on the team that passed on a chance to upgrade him with the #1 pick), but you saying a better QB would have chosen to throw deeper more often is you talking out of your anus, per usual. Also he had 0 problems throwing the ball down field last year. He had a high ADOT and as I pointed out was pretty accurate from 10-20. And if he is still incapable of processing and making throws down field, again, indictment on an organization by moving on from him and consistently talking him up all camp.
  23. 4 throws over 10 yards. 5 throws over like 6 1/2 yards. This is the gameplan with statistically the most accurate QB of 2022 between 10-20 yards. I mean, maybe he would have still been bad (1 of those 4 throws obviously was), but you spent all offseason preparing for this game just to base your gameplan on trying to play to the defenses weaknesses instead of playing to your QB's and new WR acquisitions' (Claypool included) strengths.
  24. To add on......2nd lowest intended air yards, which was the gameplan. Said gameplan also included a healthy inactive for their best blocking WR who's only purpose is to block. https://twitter.com/sean_hammond/status/1701026811897950403?s=20
  25. I'm not even down on Fields. He didn't play well, and I suspect all 22 shows he missed some open guys down the field. But this loss was a clear indictment on Poles and his coaching staff. The most FA money and high draft capital went to a RG that doesn't like to practice and 1 draft pick at the position (albeit a top 10 pick). If you're scoring at home that is 1 fewer FA and the same number of draft picks that the Bears spent on off-ball LBs. I will also accept this being referred to as 1 more draft pick and FA spent on the edge rush before training camp. But to be fair, OL and DL weren't huge needs. As for the coaching, the offense only had success with the screen pass in preseason. What else did they practice for months? Because they sure as hell kept going back to that well over and over again. 0 creativity in the pass game other than the TD to Mooney when the game was on the verge of being over already. 3rd down QB sneak with your TE. A telegraphed 4th down QB sneak, after a failed QB sneak, with a QB that can do so much more than try to fall forward behind an undersized interior OL. I understand they couldn't pass block well enough to do too much, but how many moving pockets did we get? How much playaction while actually not leaving a guy schematically unblocked? I mean, they also had free runners they were supposed to block, which again comes back to not having put enough resources to the worst position group in the league last year. The defense sat back in zone all day against a QB that has only shown he can make throws in wide open windows (TD vs Stevenson, the exception) and didn't do anything to generate a pass rush. They played a good OL, but this again comes back to not having the horses when everyone knew you didn't have horses and trying to get to a baseline level of pass rushing performance by signing a guy in August.
×
×
  • Create New...