Fun fact: Since, selecting Jim McMahon at #5 overall (1 pick after the 1st QB, Art Schlichter, went off the board in 1982), The Chicago Bears have NOT drafted the 1st, 2nd or 3rd QB taken in any draft. Even their 1st round picks (Grossman, McNown, Harbaugh) were the 4th or 5th QBs selected in the years they were drafted. Part of me really wants the Bears to take a QB at 4 or 5 or wherever they'll draft because they haven't had their chance at pick all the top guys before. And they've typically had to "settle" for whatever QB they liked that was left, or ignore the position entirely, or trade multiple 1st round picks for a QB. The typical response is "oh, I'm not sold any of these guys are franchise QBs". And honestly, I understand the sentiment. But I also feel the Bears have been sitting around waiting for this perfect QB prospect to fall in their laps for the franchise's entirety. And I think if the Bears do their job correctly and take the best guy available at 4 and develop them, that would be the ideal scenario. The top QBs all, while not ideal prospects, have something going for them. Kizer- prototype. 6'4", 230ish, huge arm, extremely mobile. Ton of upside Trubisky- accurate, mobile. Body type to hold up in the pocket. A lot of upside. Watson- extremely mobile. Ton of intangibles and experience. Winner. Big game performances. 3-year starter. That being said, if the rest of the league doesn't think these guys are that great, then even if you think one of these guys is a franchise QB, you might not have to get one at #4. You can wait for the 2nd (or more likely trade back up into the end of the 1st) and get your guy. The Browns are almost certainly taking Garrett at this point. They'll have another top 10 pick from the Rams, and can either get their QB there or (more likely IMO) trade that and/or one of their 2 other top 50 picks for Jimmy Garoppolo. So, if the Bears could get Jonathan Allen AND maybe Watson is still there (my top QB). If not, I am kinda intrigued by Kaaya and Mahomes and even Davis Webb.