raw

I don't think that the Bears will draft OT early, they are happy with their OT's and any early draft pick is going to sit behind those two for a while, barring any major injuries. They may draft 4-7 for depth, but I don't think that they see it as a need. 3 above average Interior linemen, 2 average tackles, I think that's fine, especially with those guys getting another year of experience together. I don't actually think they will either. Personally, I think its a mistake. I think we need better OT's than our current pair, when we actually throw a young QB out there. Hell, I'd make sure to draft an O-Line prospect every year, no matter what though. They do have 0 OT depth, but luckily for them, Leno played every snap and Massie missed minimal time. I think they'll pick up a developmental OT in the 4th or 5th round, but not much more than that unless they get a steal.

Order I think they come off the board? 1 Trubisky 2 Kizer 3 Watson 4 Mahomes 5 Kaaya If Allen comes out, I'd put him at 3. Order I'd take them? 1 Watson 2 Trubisky 3 Mahomes 4 Kizer 5 Kaaya Allen again at #3.

Looks like just a sprained ankle. So, I don't think it will factor in his draft status. However, his current draft status is that he hasn't yet declared. He and Juju Smith-Schuster are supposedly a package deal and if 1 comes back the other will, and vice versa. Adoree is interesting. Extremely fast, but I think he's more athlete than CB at this point. He has his moments when he makes great plays in coverage and has shutdown WRs at times. But he also gives up his fair share of plays. I'd take him at the top of the 2nd because he can be a top return man in the league right now and still develop as a CB.

1)Watson would be a huge over-reach at #3 imo 2)who would want to trade up to the third pick? It's an honest question On your 2nd part... Jets might move up to get their QB maybe? Then again.. if one of Garrett or Allen is available, I can see multiple teams calling, but not sure if they will offer enough for Bears to move down. I think we're in a great spot in the draft this year. I can't see Browns or 49ers moving so depending on which way the first 2 picks goes, the 3rd pick might be the spot where teams start calling to see if Bears will budge and after seeing Pace trade down a bunch in the 2nd last year, he'll move if the offer is right. Or we stay and get an elite talent. Watson is not a reach at #3, IMO. I feel he is the best QB in this draft, despite what the "experts" say. Bill Parcells has his criteria that all QBs must meet in order for his team to be interested (granted, it's a little outdated). 1. Must be a senior 2. Must be a graduate 3. Must be a 3-year starter 4. Must have 23 wins The only one Watson doesn't fit is a senior. He's also the only top QB who comes close to fitting any of these. As for #2, I think the Jets could trade up to 3. They did just take Petty and Hackenberg, but neither are the answer. They supposedly love Trubisky. Buffalo could trade up from 10. And the Browns, with their 2nd 1st rounder and 2 2nd round picks, could also trade back up and take the best QB in addition to drafting the best defensive player in the draft at #1 (Garrett). The Browns also supposedly love Trubisky.

No reason to be completely done with him. But also shouldn't make him a huge part of your team's plans. Let him come to camp and compete. Best case, he lives up to his first round ability. Worst case, he's not one of your top 6 CBs and you cut/trade him. Doesn't make a ton of money.

I'm starting to open up to the idea of Tyrod Taylor (assuming he's released and can be had for just money) and then drafting a guy like Patrick Mahomes. But that's mainly because I'm falling in love with Mahomes' upside. I'd still rather stay at 3 and take Watson (1A) or Trubisky (1B). But the Bears do need a lot of talent. And if the Bears think they can develop Mahomes from that Air Raid crap he ran at TT, then he could have the most upside in this draft. And if you can have an established QB like Taylor without giving up picks, potentially trade the #3 pick and still get a premium defensive talent (Solomon Thomas, Derek Barnett, Jamal Adams, Malik Hooker) in the top 10 and get a developmental QB.....that'd be an option I'd consider over a QB at 3.

I'm not sure what fantasy you think is being talked about here. If you think there's a better chance of winning games next year with either Hoyer, Barkley, or whatever they grab off the QB scrap heap than with him, then go you. I think you're very wrong. They're not gonna do better than him for his salary for one year. Also, not good enough for what? And little cap hit for cutting him? So what? What does that benefit anybody beyond ownership? I'm talking about Cutler and nothing else. Which is why I mentioned Cutler by name and nobody else.

There's a major problem with keeping Fox, IMO. The Bears have the #3 pick, a QB that hasn't worked out and a depth chart of FAs at the position. They need to find their QB of the future. The problem with QBs of the future is that they usually aren't very good in the current. If they aren't good in the current, Fox probably gets fired. If Fox gets fired, his offensive coordinator gets fired. If his OC gets fired, your QB of the future has his 2nd offensive scheme in 2 years (3rd in 3 going back to college assuming it's a rookie). So, I think there are 2 solutions here. 1. Keep Fox in 2017 and 2018. Hope to God he can woo McCoy to be his OC next year. That way you have offensive stability for your new QB. 2. Go with the status quo, team is either really good or really bad. If bad (most likely), Fox goes. You get a new HC, OC and QB all at the same time. Of course, Pace is at risk if things are too bad. One interesting thing is that Fox has never really had a developing QB. I know he's a defensive guy, but he had Tebow for what 1 year? then got Manning. He wants to win. Pace wants to win. I don't know that either of them wants a rookie QB. That scares me that they'll go after Kirk Cousins (for 20+Mil) or trade for Jimmy Garoppolo (probably would need to trade their high 2nd). Neither is a desirable option, IMO.

You guys need to let go of the Cutler fantasy. He's gone. He's not good enough. He never has been. He won the same number of games as the other 2 QBs, and didn't really play as well as either. Little cap hit for cutting him. There's literally 0 reason Cutler will or should be back. Give it up.

Hooker declared for the draft.

I don't like any safety at 3. But if I did.......

A lot of those needs are either/or propositions. 2 CBs aren't necessary. 1 good one would be sufficient. The Bears have some young guys that have shown various levels of promise. Callahan, Hall, Fuller, LeBlanc. Then Porter has shown to be serviceable for the most part. Same goes for just 1 safety. The Bears have Amos, Bush, and Jones-Quartey who are all SS's. Put them next to a good FS and let the best man win the job. I don't think the Bears need a DE and a NT. They play nickel with 2 DL 60% of the time. Goldman and Hicks are going to get the most snaps (if healthy). Bullard hopefully will step up and be the 3rd part of that rotation. In the base D, you can either add a DE (better than Bullard) or add a NT and move Goldman to DE (I like this idea). OLB isn't a huge "need". Another one would be nice as McPhee missed a lot of the year and Young is over 30. But not something they have to go crazy for. Same with TE. Miller has an injury history, but it's not a hugely important position. WR isn't a need if you re-sign Jeffery.

At 3? No.

This just changed my life.

Isn't this more of an element of always being several scores down in a game? It would be if that was true. The Bears have only been down multiple scores: - The last 6 minutes of the opener vs. the Texans. - The 2nd half of the Eagles game - The Cowboys game - The 4th quarter vs. Green Bay - The Tampa game - The Titans game - The 2nd half of the Redskins game this week Only 4 of those games came since the Bears inserted Jordan Howard into the starting RB role (the role where he's been the 2nd best rusher in the league). So, this argument doesn't work for 9 of the last 13 games.

And 29th in points is actually worse than last year. 17.9 ppg is a full FG less than last year. And not having a reliable QB is not an argument to excuse him running the ball the 4th fewest times.

Tom Crean didn't coach any defense this offseason, I see. Lost at home to Nebraska, who I think literally only scored on layups or wide open 3's.

Yeah someone is going to cave and roughly give that for him. Like you mentioned looking at what Bradford cost, the price for the Rams to trade up for Goff and the overall suckage of QBs in the draft. Someone is gonna give that. The thing about giving up a 1st is that the teams that are most likely to trade for him are picking in the top 10. I don't think anyone is trading a top 10 pick for Jimmy G. The Bradford trade is not really comparable because A) it was done right before the season and B) it was done by a team that had Superbowl aspirations and lost their QB. I'm sure the Vikings figured the pick they were giving up would be somewhere in the mid-to-late 20s at worst. If I'm the Cleveland Browns, I'd offer a 2nd and 3rd round pick. Mind you, their 2nd rounder will be the 1st pick of the round, so as good as a 1st. If the Patriots come back asking for the Rams pick the Browns have in the 1st.....I'd counter with both the 2nd round picks they have (also the Rams' 2nd). No other team can match that honestly. And it'd still leave the Browns with two top 10 picks, including #1 overall.

Yeah someone is going to cave and roughly give that for him. Like you mentioned looking at what Bradford cost, the price for the Rams to trade up for Goff and the overall suckage of QBs in the draft. Someone is gonna give that. The thing about giving up a 1st is that the teams that are most likely to trade for him are picking in the top 10. I don't think anyone is trading a top 10 pick for Jimmy G. The Bradford trade is not really comparable because A) it was done right before the season and B) it was done by a team that had Superbowl aspirations and lost their QB. I'm sure the Vikings figured the pick they were giving up would be somewhere in the mid-to-late 20s at worst. If I'm the Cleveland Browns, I'd offer a 2nd and 3rd round pick. Mind you, their 2nd rounder will be the 1st pick of the round, so as good as a 1st. If the Patriots come back asking for the Rams pick the Browns have in the 1st.....I'd counter with both the 2nd round picks they have (also the Rams' 2nd). No other team can match that honestly. And it'd still leave the Browns with two top 10 picks, including #1 overall.

This is first sentence is so inaccurate. Loggains is way over his head, just like he was the last time he was OC. The offense has been "OK" all things considered. 3 different QBs, missing Jeffery for 4 games, Long for half the season, Sitton for 2-3 games, Miller for half the season, WR drops, etc. But as "OK" as the Bears have been in moving the ball (13th in total yards per game), they are 4th from last in actually scoring the ball. Not to mention, only 19th in rushing yards despite a starting RB getting over 5 yards per carry, because Loggains calls the run the 3rd fewest amount of times in the league.

Hoosier! Gotta give some credit to the OL, especially with Long missing a ton and Sitton also missing time. But none of the other backs have close to the same numbers. So, Howard is clearly making the biggest difference. Also, shoutout to Cameron Meredith who has solidified his spot in the WR corps when the Bears really needed someone to step up due to White's lack of development. 62 catches, 800+ yards. An outside shot at 70/1,000. I think he's shown upside of a (very) low end #1 WR, which he may hit if he can cure the drops and fumbling. Not enough to make me want to let Jeffery leave, but if the Bears could get Eric Berry and a Kenny Stills for basically the same amount as Jeffery will cost....I'd take that option. Like the idea on the last part. Might want one more Stills level FA still and make White earn the second/third spot. Thompson or Bellamy can stay on as Special Teamers and Braverman or NFL roster fodder as 5th WR. Yeah, I've come to grips that John Fox will likely be back. And that likely means that Jeffery won't be. Where there's smoke there's fire and a lot of stuff out there about those 2 not getting along the last 2 years. So, my hope is that the Chargers fire McCoy and Fox fires Loggains and jumps at the chance to work with his former OC again. Then the Bears spend the Jeffery money on a top DB (Berry would be ideal, but Trumaine Johnson is also out there at CB) and bring in a guy like Stills. Then to make up for some of the WR production lost, they go after a lot of TE help (FA Doyle from Indy, draft a TE, keep Pruitt :D ) and run a lot of 2 TE sets. WR- Meredith, Stills, White, Thompson (he's a FA too), Braverman, maybe draft another guy mid-to-late rounds TE- Miller, Doyle, draft Jake Butt/or the Clemson TE, Pruitt

Hoosier! Gotta give some credit to the OL, especially with Long missing a ton and Sitton also missing time. But none of the other backs have close to the same numbers. So, Howard is clearly making the biggest difference. Also, shoutout to Cameron Meredith who has solidified his spot in the WR corps when the Bears really needed someone to step up due to White's lack of development. 62 catches, 800+ yards. An outside shot at 70/1,000. I think he's shown upside of a (very) low end #1 WR, which he may hit if he can cure the drops and fumbling. Not enough to make me want to let Jeffery leave, but if the Bears could get Eric Berry and a Kenny Stills for basically the same amount as Jeffery will cost....I'd take that option.

Here's a fun fact. The Bears have won every 4th game this season, and ONLY every 4th game. Preseason? Bears start 0-3, win their 4th preseason game vs. the Browns. Regular season? Bears lose to Texans, Eagles and Cowboys to start 0-3.....before winning the 4th game vs. the Lions. Bears then go on a 3-game losing streak (Colts, Jags, Packers) before getting an improbable win over the 5-1 Vikings Bears go on another 3-game losing streak (Bucs, Lions, Titans) before ending that streak with a win over the 49ers. The Bears have since lost 3 straight and are currently on a 3-game losing streak.

Prescott was clearly decent evaluation and a lot of luck. As was Wilson. But that's the nature of mid round QBs. You draft one hoping to get lucky. The Bears aren't in a position to hope they get lucky. Also of note, the Cowboys had Romo. They didn't "need" a QB, so they thought. The Seahawks just got rid of their franchise QB, Hasselbeck, and paid a decent amount of money to get Matt Flynn, who they thought would be their starter. I guess the equivalent is getting a Mike Glennon or (as was mentioned) Tyrod Taylor, and then drafting a guy in the middle rounds. But then you're intentionally missing out on the top QB for stopgaps and longshots. Your examples include drafts that had QBs go 1-2. Seattle would have certainly picked Luck or RG3 if they could have. Dallas would have probably picked Goff or Wentz if they could have and had the knowledge that Romo would miss 1/2 the season. The Bears can't get guys at 1-2, but there isn't a Luck in this draft. But QBs went 1-2 last year and I personally think Watson, Kizer and Trubisky are better than the 3 1st rounders from last year.

So Cutler at less money (or without the guarantees) would've been less attractive to keep around? I just don't see it. Despite what the narrative was, he wasn't overpaid and there wasn't a better option. But that's kind of irrelevant to this whole conversation anyway (aside from the fact that I still think they'd be better off keeping him but that's neither here nor there, I guess). I'd actually be pretty interested in seeing a round by round breakdown of the guys you listed and how they came into the league. There's just so many first round busts that it all seems like a big ass crapshoot to me (and maybe a lot of that is, you know, teams reaching for guys who probably didn't deserve to be taken in the 1st because of the importance of the position). 1st paragraph, I've never said anything close to any of that. It's not a crapshoot, though. It's a skill. A skill to identify, draft, and develop a good QB. The busts have clearly been severely flawed going into the draft (Manziel, Manuel, Weeden, Ponder, etc) and have been reaches based on physical tools and/or desperation. The successful QBs after the 1st have been players the NFL clearly overthought due to nitpicking (Wilson, Cousins, Carr, etc.). The reason I've pointed out McNown and Grossman is because they were the 4th and 5th QBs drafted in the 1st round when the Bears picked them. Pretty clear case of settling on NOT the best and taking a QB just because you have the need. But the Bears have a chance to pick whoever they determine as the best, which they haven't done almost ever. Again, if QBs go 1-2 and the Bears can't trade up...that's a different situation. But if the Bears have a choice to pick the #1 QB on their board and they end up getting the 3rd or 4th QB in the 2nd round because they don't feel their guy is worth the 3rd overall pick....then that is an issue.