I think the safest bet with all these guys is to take a three year average and work with that. This treats the covid year as a full year, but does it for all of them and I don't want to take the time to do the more rigorous math. Swanson: 10.5 fwar - 28 y Correa: 9.1 fwar - 27 y Turner: 13.9 fwar - 29 y Bogaerts: 10.2 fwar - 29 y Which is a pretty clear win for Turner. However, if you look at total WAR, it falls like this: Swanson: 14.7 fwar - 28 y Correa: 28.8 fwar - 27 y Turner: 29.7 fwar - 29 y Bogaerts: 32.5 fwar - 29 y Which is a pretty clear win for Bogaerts, but really says anyone but Swanson. Frankly, since we have Hoerner to play SS, I'd prefer to get the one who is least dependent on defense for their value. That would point to Bogaerts or Turner. I'd really prefer not giving up the penalty for the QO, all things being equal, which points to Correa. I'd rather get a slight underpay (or shorter contract) for the guy coming off the down year, rather than overpay for the guy coming off a career year; which would point again to Correa. Durability matters a lot for a guy you're giving a 10 year contract to, so that probably points to anyone but Correa. In the end, I'd probably vote for Bogaerts if he's willing to play 2nd or 3rd base. Turner would be my really close second choice, and Correa a fairly distant third. I don't trust Swanson's breakout enough to give the man a 10 year deal. I'd pass hard if he's the only one left standing. I just don't see him in the same class as the other three.