Soul
-
Posts
43,494 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Soul
-
Before you put money down without looking, realize that was my personal spread. I read somewhere LSU is favored, I wanna say by 5 or 6. :lol: the emboldened wouldn't have occurred...I'm not touching touching this game with the line at LSU -6. I believe LSU will win, but it could very easily be by less than 6. Or LSU could just blow them out. Seriously, I wouldn't touch this game with a 10 foot pole.
-
USC - OSU would have been a good game. :D Seriously, OSU ranked above LSU, so they would have been in the title game no matter what. That's a valid point, although in my mind, two fluky triple OT losess is not as bad as a home loss to Illinois. As Les Miles said, "We're undefeated - in regulation." There's just no way the BCS could keep OSU out of the title game, and then put Mizzou in over Kansas. That would have been worse than what happened. You'd be locking out the only 2 large conference teams with 1 loss in favor of 2 loss clubs. I know it's become popular to bash OSU and the Kansas pick, but the alternative would have been stark raving madness. The BCS was in an impossible position this year. And it definitely shows beyond all doubt how inadequate the system is.
-
Are we going to do ANYTHING beyond signing a couple deep bench players and juggling around current guys into new roles on the pitching staff and the like? This is shaping up to be the "do nothing" offseason like I haven't seen in a long time. -
What's Jim's VORH (Value Over Replacing Hendry)??
-
Someone was going to really get screwed. Looks like it was Mizzou. I'm very happy Illinois will be playing in the Rose bowl. I'm not saying they deserve it, and I'm not sure they can be competitive with a powerhouse like USC. IL is an up-and-coming team, a work in progress. Most of their good players are young, need more seasoning to hone their performances and achieve some consistency. If they have a good day, they can probably stay close to anybody. My experience has been though, the Big 10 teams get out there and look a little discombobulated. Message to Zook: keep your team at home for as long as possible. Do your practices in Illinois. The longer they are out there, the less focused they'll be able to be.
-
LSU has a month to get healthy =D> \:D/ , I wouldn't be sizing up rings for tOSU any time soon. Lots of sour grapes in here :cry: . At least they have the fact that Ohio State did so well last year against the SEC in the national championship game on their side. They'll beat Ohio State. It won't even be close. I'm with you. Same argument can be said to the alledged Illinois/USC match up as well. Is it written in stone yet that Illinois will go? That's extraordinary in and of itself. BTW, I agree OSU and IL will both be at a disadvantage, but let's not forget that both games will basically be home games for LSU & USC. HUGE advantages in fan support
-
Hey look at this, as usual, nobody cares. I dunno, seems like you care. Heh. Cares enough to say he doesn't care.
-
Hawaii strikes back! 21-7 (pend xpt)
-
Now I've seen everything. Mr. T promoting World of Warcraft. Eeeehh?
-
When they beat BSU I thought they might have something, but this is just not a competitive effort.
-
LMAO, that was hilarious.
-
Not anything that hasn't been heard before when other teams have done the same thing. Personally, I don't really care about the conference champion label. LSU had 2 conference losses, Georgia had 2 conference losses. The fact that LSU played in the easier division doesn't mean in my mind that they should be given more consideration. Now if you say that LSU had the better resume, that is a different story, but I'm not sure that can be proven. Yes, but the implications are nightmarish when a conf champion with the same # of losses is locked out over a team that didn't even make it to the conf championship game. That pretty much says that the conference system itself is bunk, and when we're talking about the BCS, I'm much more inclined to think it's the BCS that is bunk, not the conferences.
-
Washington is a lower-tier Pac-10 team, and right now they look like they're in another league from Hawaii. Even Locker looks to be just plain faster than anyone on Hawaii's defense.
-
Ohio State sucks. I'd argue they're the worst team of all the conference champions. You'd be wrong. I don't think they are as talented as Oklahoma, LSU, or USC, but could beat any on any given day. Ohio St. has the most quality loss of the group and were the most consistent team of the group. Exactly. Its not like OSU was barely getting by these "weak" teams. They dominated every non conference opponent, and didnt allow more than 17 points to anybody besides U of I. They dominated basically everybody on their schedule. You could say the same about KU, except OSU's loss was to a worse team. I'm not advocating KU. I'm saying tOSU doesn't have a great resume. OSU's loss was to a team that was within 7 points of the team that beat KU. Plus, let's not pretend that Big 10 schools are the only ones who schedule fodder games. WVU had Western Mich, Marshall, and East Carolina. I don't see anyone slinging mud at them for it. And they aren't alone, either. This is standard practice for many, many big schools.
-
Now Washington is threatening to go up 2 TDs on Hawaii.
-
If this doesn't prove once and for all how woefully inadequate the BCS is, then nothing will. There's literally no way possible that the championship game doesn't become a farce. No way you can tell me the two teams that will play are the undisputed most deserving. About 10 teams have pretty much a legit argument this year. Please end this madness. It has never worked, and it won't magically begin to.
-
There are SOOO many rumors floating around here right now it's not even funny. At this point I'm just waiting until something is finalized one way or the other, so I don't get caught up in the hoopla. I won't be upset either way. Frankly, I might be glad if LM leaves at this point. Wow, if that's true then Herbstreit's credibility is going to take a huge hit.
-
Yeah, they still couldn't do it even when they had the biggest powerhouse of a football team they've seen in GB since the Lombardi days. Not sure what the defense will do in January. They might be a little better at covering the pass. I like GB's defense overall. But it won't be Rodgers coming in and settling down the situation. It'll almost certainly be Favre for the whole game, and much as I do think he's one of the best ever, this place just seems to have his number.
-
Rodgers looked flat out better than Favre, at least for those two drives. I know he's not, but he got the Packers back to doing what they have been successful with for the entire year.
-
Some players and teams just don't fare well in some stadiums. I don't think it's irrelevant at all. Did you watch Favre last night? Did that look like the same player you've seen the rest of the year? O.K. then. He doesn't play well in that building. I can't tell you scientifically why, but 3 times is a charm. 9 times? That's called a trend.
-
Kind of a relief, no? Does this mean we can't get Fukudome now though?
-
Just like how Favre was undefeated when the temperature was less than 34 degrees and we had the Falcons at home in the playoffs when it was freezing. We all know what happened then. Yeah, Michael Vick raped the Pack's defense. You aren't really going to argue that a Packer failure that broke a weather trend is the same thing as winning a game in a building where the Pack has never won, against a version of the opponent that is better than any version the Pack has ever faced in that building? Are you? I like this year's Cowboys team, but I'm not sure if they are better than the Aikman-Smith-Irvin version. Well -- latter day version, sure they are. The Pack weren't really a winning club until mid-late '90s, of course they were going to lose to the Boys in the early '90s.
-
Just like how Favre was undefeated when the temperature was less than 34 degrees and we had the Falcons at home in the playoffs when it was freezing. We all know what happened then. Yeah, Michael Vick raped the Pack's defense. You aren't really going to argue that a Packer failure that broke a weather trend is the same thing as winning a game in a building where the Pack has never won, against a version of the opponent that is better than any version the Pack has ever faced in that building? Are you?
-
Moreno on Mitchell Report: "There's going to be names"
Soul replied to xecuter83's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Because it's irrelevant to the here and now. I would care if a Cub tested positive now, because it would have a direct impact on the team, as well as proving that individual an idiot for taking something now that MLB has a testing program. But revealing who used in the past serves no purpose. Does it have to serve a purpose in the here & now in order to be something that's worthwhile knowing? And what purpose does it serve? How is it worthwhile knowing? It's just one more piece of information that I can use to determine how I will view that period in baseball history. It's like anything else historical. There's no current purpose served, it's just knowing more about what really happened. -
How about because the Packers have been down there 9 times with Favre, and are 0-9? At least that's what they said on the broadcast last night.
