He doesn't need to be a free spender to be successful. We all know that. I actually don't mind his attempts to build up the ballpark, the system, the ST facilities, etc. That's all good stuff, IMO. I really wonder about his decision to keep Hendry in place. It feels like he's punting on a big decision when he should be aggressively acting to change the philosophy of how the big club is run. Especially if he wants to match up with a lower-payroll strategy, which it looks like he is attempting to do. I don't want to be sitting here 5 years from now, changing GMs after a bunch of wasted years because Ricketts finally figured out that Jim can't win without a very loose purse. I'd rather make that change now, up front...