Yes and no. He could have done more with some talent, but he was also pretty rigid in what he wanted, underutilizing a good TE and seeing him shipped off because of it. And he seems to prefer smaller/quicker WRs so I'm not sure I'd give him the benefit of the doubt if he had been given the talent that's here now. He needed something specific that he wasn't given and part of his failure is his inability to adapt. Granted a properly utilized Olsen wouldn't have brought back the Greatest Show on Turf type results, but it may have let him reach Turner level results. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk David's right on Martz, he wasn't the problem at all. The problem or a problem? I'd agree talent was the overall issue, but I have zero faith Martz would be using this group of talent that well either, or any group that didn't fit his mold. This all started with David making a rather midrange statement which frankly anyone should be able to agree with even if you didn't really like Martz. Now it's turning into a whole bunch of other stuff.