Yeah, so what? That's his opinion. Williamson was bad. He fetched little because he was worth little. 28.1 IP 27 H 32 K. Williamson struggled because he walked too many guys, but a smart organization will find a spot for a guy who gives up less than a hit an inning and strikes out more than a guy per inning. Those guys don't grow on trees, and can definitely a help a team. Williamson was a good pickup by Hendry for little cost. The ability to strike out anyone that steps in the box against you is a valuable asset, especially in a relief role. Like you said too many walks. He's had plenty of time to get his control back. It hasn't happened because it isn't going to happen. His WHIP wasn't all that great, he's in his 30's, and his arm is double-post-op. What were you expecting to get for him, out of curiosity? We picked him up for a bag of beans because nobody wanted him..... As for the strikeouts, I watch the guy pitch. He gets K's because he goes deep into counts on every hitter. I don't view that as necessarily an indicator of dominance. Just an indicator that he has little control, and gets into trouble. I watched Scotty struggle & struggle. That's what I saw. And I'm pretty sure that's what other teams around the league saw as well. Maybe I'm wrong. It's all about opinions.