The point I am trying to make, perhaps not so wel is this: If the Cubs actually find a time share partner for Murton I think it is a poor use of recources. People can call it what they like, I don't really care. To me the big question is, what are the Cubs going to do about CF if JJ is traded? I don't think Pie is ready, and hope is not a plan. Whether or not it is a good allocation of resources depends on what the intent is behind the signing. If we sign Floyd with the intent of giving him significant starting time, then we will pay him more money for a job Murton could do on his own. But, if we sign Floyd (or someone else) primarily as a bench option and reserve in case of injuries and plan on only starting him once in a while over Murton, then his pay will be quite lower and we'll have a solid bat off the bench. The first case is a bad allocation of resources, paying more money for just a little more production than we could get from the current player. But, if we pay bench player's money for a player who could, arguably, be starter quality and actually use him in the latter role, it's a very good allocation of funds. Again, it all depends on the intent behind the signing and, relatedly, how much Floyd (et al) cost.