Actually, for as many people who have been down on Vince (and there are a whole lot), he's actually fairly well in line with a young Steve McNair right now. Vince, first 2 yrs as a starter: 51.5 comp %, 12 TD/13 INT, 4.9 y/a 62.3 comp %, 9 TD/17 INT, 6.7 y/a McNair, first 2 yrs as a starter: 52.0 comp %, 14 TD/13 INT, 6.4 y/a 58.7 comp %, 15 TD/10 INT, 6.6 y/a McNair was definitely better, but you have to consider he had two years to sit on the bench, play sparingly and learn from Chris Chandler before taking over. Vince was thrown right into the fire and expected to not only play well, but also win. Steve also had better receivers than Vince. McNair turned out to be a very good QB in his prime and I think there's no question it's still way too early to make any decision on Vince. This wasn't directed at you at all, by the way GoCubsGo. You just happened to make the last post about Vince.