Everyone (including myself) who didn't give this a chance forgot A.J. Smith - one of the dumber GMs out there, apparently - was making the decisions in San Diego. Why would people scoff at the idea that a team would give up on an expensive RB with a ton of miles on his legs who just can't stay healthy or produce anymore? 1,110 yards and 12 total TDs is not producing? He's not the greatest RB (possibly) ever anymore, but he's still a whole lot better than Darren Sproles. As for staying healthy, he's played in less than 16 games in a season one time in his career - 2004. He got hurt in the last two playoff appearances for SD, but three games out of 35 doesn't indicate he "can't stay healthy." He's averaged what, 400 touches a year for 8 years? He went under 4 yards per carry this season and his production dropped a lot, and he hasn't been able to finish two seasons in a row. These guys fall apart quickly. NFL teams can't afford to pay exhorbitant dollars for pedestrian numbers. He's got Shaun Alexander written all over him. Teams can get in a lot of trouble from trying to squeeze every last yards out of a RB. The last time he had 400 touches was three years ago (348 rushing, 56 receiving). Since then he's had 375 and 346. He's had more than 400 touches three times in his career (2002, 2003, 2006). Yes, he's been hurt in the final game or two the past two seasons, but has also played all 16 regular season games each year. LT is definitely past his prime and may begin to fall off some, but you don't cut him because you have Darren Sproles. Cut back on his carries? Sure, but don't cut him after he's missed three games in the past 35 opportunities. Now, if we were discussing signing him - I wouldn't give him a mega-deal at this point. But since he's already signed and you're going to take a cap hit whether you keep him or cut him, then you might as well see if he can still be a very productive back. If he can't, cut him next year.