I think we can matter in a couple of years, I just don't know how likely it is. I'm generally very optimistic, but I'm trying to be sure to weight the optimism with realism too and not get too gung-ho (not saying you are, by the way). I'd just hate to get my expectations higher than are realistic and then take it out on Dooley if we don't reach them. Somehow I forgot about Lathers, I really like him. I see 2012 as similar to this year, but much better. This year, our starters can hang with any team in the SEC, but we get blown out when we start bringing guys in off the bench. By 2012, I see the starters as capable of winning the SEC, but they'll be held back by too much youth and inexperience on the bench. I think it'll take one extra year to get the depth settled and strong enough for us to realistically compete for an SEC title. The starters will be fine, whether the depth can keep up the starters' level of play is my question. I really hope you're right and I'm wrong, though. I'd love to be very much in the SEC title hunt in two years.