How good of a rumor? What's the source? I ask because I would gladly trade some offense for Jesse Crain. Any clue what the deal is with his K rate? The last time I saw a K rate that low was Kolb last year, and well, the wheels kinda fell off his following year. Speaking of Kolb reminds me just how many bullets the Cubs dodged last year by not acquiring Kolb, Benitez or Percival. If the Cubs had successfully traded for Kolb and he blew up like that, almost everyone on this board would have blamed somebody for ruining him or not being able to turn him around. Yet, the God of pitching coaches, Leo Mazzone, couldn't do it either. It just goes to show, our analysis of who to blame, isn't always accurate. Back on topic, I can't explain Kolb's blow-up at all. But I don't think there is much evidence to suggest that just because someone shares one characteristic with Danny Kolb, a low strikeout rate, that he will befall the same fate as him. It is true that both Kolb and Crain don't strikeout a lot of guys. Whether a low strikeout rate is a clear portent for failure in the future is a whole different matter. Let's look deeper. Kolb has never been much of a strikeout guy on any level of baseball. From rookie-ball all the way to the majors, he has averaged less than a K per inning. He never even come close. His ERA has also been consistently average to above average. At rookie level, he had his best ERA at 2.20. In A-ball, it was 3.77, and at AA it was 4.14. In AAA, it was 2.94. His career ERA in the majors is 4.17. Maybe, Kolb is just an up and down, inconsistent pitcher from year-to-year and '05 was one of his down years while '03 and '04 were both up years. Whatever the reason, his history shows a pattern of inconsistency with his norm being that he is an average to slightly above average pitcher. I think he is better than '05 suggests and now would be the time to trade for him, keeping in mind, of course, that he isn't normally as good as he looked in '03 and '04. Crain's history is quite different. He did average more than a K per inning until coming to the majors. It then fell off quite a bit, but his effectiveness did not. Crain has been getting guys out at every level. I'm not aware of his injury history. I don't think he has one. But I do know that he has been used exclusively as a reliever throughout his minor and major league careers. so, there shouldn't be a lot of wear and tear on his arm. He is only 24. Scouting reports have his fastball in the mid-90s with the ability to touch 100 and a wicked slider that was described as "unfair". He was the 2nd round pick of the Twins in the 2002 draft and between rookie and A-ball that year, he appeared in 18 games, pitching 27 innings and finishing with an ERA of 1.00. In '03, he started in High A, pitched 19 innings before being promoted to AA where he pitched 39 innings finishing with a combined ERA of 1.40. He finished '03 at AAA Rochester posting a 3.12 ERA. Before being brought up near the end of '04, he pitched 50 innings at Rochester compiling a 2.49 ERA. Since reaching the majors, nothing has changed except his K rate has dropped. His career ERA currently stands at 2.29. That's both player's histories in a nutshell. What do you think? I think the fact that he is only 24, and has a history of high K numbers makes him a totally different story. I was just wondering if there was any reason for his K numbers being so low. I don't think he'll be another Kolb. Also, for all the crappy moves the cubs have made, not shelling out for a closer (Percival or Kolb) was a pretty good decision. Also, that's some pretty good detective work. Timely too! Do you have like a business card or something?