Most aren't talking about the court of law, but the court of public opinion. That's what the 'scandal' has done- opened up guys who get bigger and stronger and hit way more homers than usual to questions. They definitely shouldn't, and probably won't ever, be punished unless there's some hard, reliable evidence. The problem with the court of public opinion here is that it is dominated by the usual sportswriting characters, like ESPN and such, who are more interested in gaining readers/viewers than they are in telling the full story. Obviously, there are many exceptions. But doesn't it seem that for every great article out there you have to wade through a ton of crap -- particularly where controversy is involved? And, yes, I used wade there on purpose. I think it should be a new Board rule that when quoting a post from Wade, you have to topically use wade in your own post.