Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Thusly Boned

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    1,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Thusly Boned

  1. I really feel like Arrieta is about to fall apart, and I want no part of him on a multi-year contract. It was a great time, but happy trails to you, Jake.
  2. Well, then he can bugger right the horsefeathers off.
  3. Bingo Yeah, this has to be it. Machado is a fine player, but trading for him doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. I really don't like the idea of giving up some of our best young players to acquire a player who may very well prove to be a one year rental and while certainly an upgrade, isn't so at a position of dire need. I'd much, much rather leave the infield as is, concentrate on pitching (Darvish, plz) this offseason and spend on Harper the next. I like the odds of the offense being really horsefeathering good next year as it is. But if the pretense of serious interest in Machado prices the Cardinals out (or better yet leads them to overpay), then great.
  4. Probably gonna claim he was hacked after he wakes up from his sparking cider hangover and regrets his tone Sparking cider sounds like a good time to me.
  5. Angelos is that organization's biggest problem. That guy is the epitome of a meddling owner.
  6. It's hard to tell how things would go with that team. While I don't think there would be a fleecing (I don't think the Cards would allow themselves to be fleeced), if Angelos involves himself, Machado would not come cheap. I think the likely outcome of this is that the demands end up being so unreasonable for a one-year rental that Machado isn't moved at all.
  7. The Cardinals getting Machado would certainly make 2018 a lot more interesting, but it's not something that would upset me all that much because it would cost Reyes/Weaver plus, and the Cards would have a snowball's chance in hell of retaining him beyond next year.
  8. I have a feeling that Piscotty bounces back and that he'll produce well enough to make people wonder why the Cardinals bothered with this Piscotty/Ozuna swap. It wasn't really a pure baseball move. They were shopping him to the A's last summer not long after his moms diagnosis. Yeah, it was a nice move made out of consideration for the player. That said, I have serious doubts that it's a move they make if Piscotty had a 2017 that was similar to his 2016. He was never going to be a star, but settling in as a 3-4 WAR player is certainly a strong possibility, stronger now that he isn't stuck halfway across the country from his dying mother.
  9. If Cobb is going to demand 20MM per, he can kick rocks. I'd rather see if Darvish could be had for ~5/125, or deal for a risk/upside guy like Salazar.
  10. Yeah, the likely motivation for the Sox would have to be flipping him. I just see very little chance of him extending regardless of the team.
  11. Yeah, while Longo would be a defensive upgrade, he'd likely be a lateral move offensively.
  12. This whole offseason has been a snoozefest.
  13. Bruce playing RF in that ballpark would be amusing, at least.
  14. [tweet] [/tweet] The poor bastard
  15. out of curiosity, who is making personnel decisions for the marlins right now? I don't know, but their collective bed is being [expletive] in, that's for certain.
  16. Expected. This definitely makes them better, but not enough so to move the needle much in terms of the division. I hope they paid through the nose.
  17. Please no. Not only does that not make sense for the Cubs, wasn't the rumor that the Indians wanted LH hitting in return? I mean, that idea is just comprehensively stupid.
  18. I don't see a fit for us here at all. There's probably going to be a considerable cost to acquire him, he's a lock to test free agency after this year, and he doesn't play a position of need. I actually kind of hope the Cardinals take a run at him.
  19. Machado, maybe. But not Harper. They're not just going to completely ignore the luxury tax, and they've got their OF (and DH) pretty well covered now.
  20. Imagine how it must feel to be a Marlins fan (they do have a few) today. I'd be sick as hell. For a second after the sale of the team, the poor bastards probably thought they were done enduring these teardowns.
  21. This is fine. Takes our biggest competition for Harper off the board (ostensibly).
  22. I wasn't expecting him to.sign with the Cubs, but the Angels? That just seems ill-advised. OTOH, with the way this has played out, it's fitting that it was the least expected outcome that actually occurred.
  23. It would, and it absolutely would. It's fun to dream on, but Stanton and Harper are an either-or proposition, for any team. And if we're choosing, I choose Harper all day.
  24. And if true, Stanton being willing to accept a trade to the Midwest, but not to St. Louis, is horsefeathering delicious.
  25. Sure, but I am becoming irrationally confident that Harper is a Cub in 2019.
×
×
  • Create New...