Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Jason Ross

North Side Contributor
  • Posts

    6,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Jason Ross

  1. It certainly hasn't worked out, but the worst case scenario in that trade is like, we lost a backup OF'er. It's barely on the register of bad trades in history.
  2. Hey, the good news is that the Brewers only have an xBA of .441 so they're technically getting a little lucky today... (This post is dripping with sarcasm for anyone who needs that assurance)
  3. Cant' tell what's worse; The Cubs down 6-1 to the Brewers or my other viewing choice...Kentucky - 7 Georgia - 35
  4. It feels like this one is already over. I'm hoping that it's just that nagging voice inside my head, but feeling a bit despondent about it already.
  5. After today the Cubs will have the rest of their pitching on normal rest. First inning has been rough, but I understand the logic here. Colin Rea has not been particularly great against Milwaukee himself. 5.2IP, 3ER, 5BB, 4 K in August 4IP, 2 ER, 1 BB, 2 K in August So that's 5 runs in 9 innings with as many walks as K's. I'm not sure there was a great choice game 1 coming off the series. But this the advantage of being the 1 seed and not the 4 seed.
  6. Goddamnit. You know it's a rough inning when Hoerner is making errors.
  7. Just not sure he has a spot. Cubs already have Colin Rea, Aaron Civale and Michael Soroka who all are in the same "eat some innings" RHP role. Ben Brown has been really good in small samples against Milwaukee and offers a different type of look; RHP with velo. Assad has been fine this year, but I'm not sure there's a right or a wrong way to rank Assad with the other 3 "RHP who eat innings". If the Cubs have him ranked fourth there, I think it's pretty understandable. And Brown can even eat some innings if they want to go that way. So between Brown and whomever you have ranked fourth there, I think going with Brown has an argument as well.
  8. Ben Brown in the year vs Milwaukee: 11 IP, 9K, 2 ER, 2BB While small sample stuff is what it is he has been successful in two starts against them this year. He won't be counted on for much, but for a neutral splits team (even with the BABIP as Bertz pointed out) his success probably a small benefit here. He can be dominant with his fastball and curve. And if you use him it's likely only for an inning or two, but his length could be important in any extra inning game. Cubs have two lefties as well and the Padres were much worse against LHP than RHP.
  9. There's always something. Teams have essentially hacked physics with the concept of seam-shifted wake. And Kittredge is a good example of what happens when you can make a guy throw a 90-mph slider. Ben Brown is throwing a curveball at 90mph and he's not alone in that.
  10. His glove is likely too important. The Cubs are going to be in another low scoring series. Castro might be able to draw in if you expect a high-fly-ball game and a pitcher who has a strong LHH split, but I think you roll with the glove. Swanson and Hoerner showed last night how you can create your own variance (similar xBA' but the Cubs had 2x the hits because those two ate up about 4 of them). Shaw at 3b will help to create the variance defensively.
  11. I believe that is simply due to the graphics used by Statcast to display their strikes as I believe they just use the save overlay. Consider it a visual representation versus a 1:1 implementation in graphic of a specific hitter. Hawk Eye is the system being implemented by Savant and MLB and Hawk Eye certainly accounts for batter height. Every hitter has a customized and created zone according to MLB and how they use Hawk Eye.
  12. I think it's a trick from K-Zone. Every year ESPN's K-Zone gets flak for stuff like this. Because K-Zone makes it look low, we automatically believe it with our eyes. But here is the Statcast track of the Bogaerts PA. That's a strike according to Savant. Similar things were happening early in this series when PCA was swinging up and inside. K-zone said he was chasing, Savant had him swinging at high strikes in the zone. It's always tough to figure out which system is the best as the zone is not something that lives on a two dimensional plane, but something that exists in three. Yet K-Zone and Savant both depict is as flat. As long as a pitch clips the zone in that three dimensional plane, it's a strike according to the rules. What makes that hard is showing it throw a flat, 2-d panel and how it may or may not clip that zone. I always tend to lean towards Savant. I use K-zone from a viewing standpoint and then allow Savant to either confirm or refute the K-Zone call (I am that dork who has a 3-screen split when watching games which includes a Savant screen. This is a judgement free zone) This is getting first party data from MLB's system direct, Hawk Eye. Hawk Eye will be used by the ABS system next year. Just feels the most prudent everything considered.
  13. 38! I just have a baby face. The light hides all my gray haha
  14. Not that anyone cares about how deep the "umpires call guys out when the ball beats the runner" conspiracy goes, but it's seemingly trickled all the way down to the depths of the Lexington Adult Baseball scene. It's deep. *me, still mad about getting tossed at 3rd that one time this year.
  15. I don't think they *have* to, but my guess is that they will ere on the side of caution. Better to review anything close than to refuse it, and then deal with the fallout tomorrow.
  16. Use them by the 7th or you lose them essentially. 8th on and you can ask for a review.
×
×
  • Create New...