Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Jason Ross

North Side Contributor
  • Posts

    7,870
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    68

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Jason Ross

  1. Ryan Zeferjahn, acquired by the Cubs during their mad dash before the 2026 MLB trade deadline, is a lot of things. He's a fireballer; he's a wild man; he's a freak; he's an alien. Whatever you want to call him, he's an outlier of a baseball player. The Cubs acquired some names who are more familiar than Zeferjahn. Kevin Gausman, for example, has been among the best starters in baseball for half a decade. But no player may have a bigger impact on a per-inning basis than their new weapon out of the bullpen—that is, if the Cubs (or any team) can learn how to tame the beast. Let's start with the elephant in the room: this dude walks people. He's walked people since he was back in college, so it's nothing new. Baseball America, in his 2019 draft profile, highlighted his propensity to vacillate between striking hitters out and walking them. "Two weeks before striking out 14 against the Longhorns, he walked seven hitters in six innings against Baylor," they noted. I'd love to tell you this has gotten better over the years, but since coming up in 2024 with the Los Angeles Angels, he's got the third highest walk rate in baseball among pitchers who have thrown at least 125 innings. This year, he's walked 14.3% of his opponents. Strangely enough, it just might not matter. What makes Zeferjahn an alien is his fastball. This is a special pitch. What makes it so special is how he spins it; it's incredibly inefficient. We're programed to have a negative connotation with things that are inefficient, but with pitches, it's not necessarily a bad thing. In layman's terms, low efficiency means more cut and less backspin. We live in a world in which velocity is king, but as everyone chases every last mile-per-hour, things become more normalized. Throwing 97 MPH today just isn't special. You have to stand out in some other way. I'll borrow a line from Kevin Goldstein to highlight this: "The further one can get from the norm, the more effective the pitch can be beyond just the pure speed. Hitters expect a fastball to behave a certain way out of the hand and when it doesn’t, regardless of the direction in which it deviates, it creates challenges in terms of making hard contact, or any contact at all." SzRCRFJfWGw0TUFRPT1fQWdVSFVsWURVMVlBWFZaVUF3QUhBZ0lDQUFOWFd3VUFVMU1DQ1FGVVVBTUdCd2NF.mp4 What Zeferjahn does with his fastball's shape makes it special. He throws a relatively low-slot fastball with inefficient spin. The result is that the shape of the pitch is elite: his Stuff+ on the pitch ranks top-10 in baseball (relievers only), ahead of Jeff Hoffman, Tanner Scott, and Louis Varland. To highlight how his slot and spin rate help create this, let's compare his fastball to another pitcher's which seems similar on the surface, that of Pirates righty Jared Jones. Jones and Zeferjahn have similar RPM on their fastballs and have similar velocities (though Jones does throw a little harder). In theory, you'd think they would have similar Stuff+, but they do not. Jones's fastball clocks in with FanGraphs's Stuff+ model as a 92, while Zeferjahn's is a 120. This is vastly different. Jones gets great results on the pitch, so this isn't a dig on Jones, but Zeferjahn is on another planet. He leads on Whiff% (41.1% versus 24.9%), and he's given up just four hits all season to the tune of an absurd .087 batting average. If you're worried he's getting good luck, don't fear. His xBA on the pitch is just .105. Like I said; he's a freak. The Cubs adore low-spin-efficiency fastballs. While he's not as inefficient as Cade Horton (who is under 80% in terms of active spin), he's definitely in the correct organization—one that really targets this pitch. We have seen firsthand what the Cubs could do on the fly with Horton, adding a sinker and using his cut-ride fastball to really attack hitters in interesting ways. It's not hard to think what the Cubs could do with their new toy, or that the Cubs may be in a better position than the Angels to get the most out of it. What's shocking is that his fastball might not even be his best pitch. You could make a compelling argument that his sweeper, which he throws roughly a third of the time, is just as good, or better. That pitch boasts an impressive 118 on FanGraphs's Stuff+ model, and also sees hitters whiff on it over 40% of the time. He has two plus-plus offerings in shape and production. Again: it's special stuff. Zeferjahn isn't just an alien on the mound with the stuff he's capable of throwing at a hitter, he's a statistical freak as well: he has a 96th-percentile whiff rate and just a 2nd-percentile chase rate. That's unfathomable. What it means is that if the guy can just throw enough strikes, no one is going to touch him. We can see that because, even when hitters do make contact, his batted-ball data against is pretty good, too. If you want to dream as to what could be, look no further than his last 16 innings, because there's a chance something has just clicked, and there's some data to support that it might not be smoke and mirrors. Over his last 16 innings, Zeferjahn has just four walks. Over his last 10 innings, he has walked just one hitter. Interestingly enough, the walk he had was called a strikeout on the field. The Giants' Grant McCoy had to use an ABS challenge to even get the walk. What's the change? His release point—which has moved because he's slid toward third base in his setup on the rubber, and is striding slightly more closed. On the left is Zeferjahn in April; on the right is him last month. This is a major departure in his motion and seems to correlate with his improved walk rate. It's too small of a sample to say "mission accomplished!" and that everything is fixed, but when we see outlier data coupled with a noticeable change, it makes you feel like there's a reason behind the improvement—and that it could therefore be sustainable. He's on a better line to tunnel his stuff and to keep it on the plate, and lo, everything has changed for the better. Over that span, it's not just the walks that are improved; he's absolutely dominating hitters. Since June 23, the righty has struck out almost half the hitters he's faced. This is Mason Miller levels of dominance. In his last outing as an Angel, he managed to strikeout four Brewers in a nearly perfect five-out performance. It's easy to imagine how much fun it could be seeing him do that to Milwaukee at Wrigley. All of this leads me back to my premise; this guy is an alien. He's unique. He has a great fastball that highlights its odd, inefficient spin and low arm slot. He's a whiff merchant, even while generating almost no chase. He used to walk everyone, but lately, he can't walk anyone. There just aren't many pitchers like this in baseball. The upside is massive; the risk is real. But he's a unique player, and one who could slot into a Cubs bullpen for years to come—because the best part about Zeferjahn is that despite being 28 years old, he's a late bloomer and won't hit free agency until November 2030. There's a good chance that one of the most unhittable pitchers in baseball will be shutting teams down for the Cubs for quite some time.
  2. I also wasnt expecting them to deal Rojas. That said, from what I have been told by two people who know, and Keith Law posting about similar things last night (as cool as Keith Law to have been one of the people I talked to, we are not running in the same social circles haha)...I am actually not surprised as all they used Rojas in that vein.
  3. Assad as options and my guess is he will be in Iowa at some point. He's been solid, but Colin Rea as a swingman makes a lot of sense. This way you can allow Assad to be stretched to any injuries down the stretch and because you cannot assume Cabrera's healthy return to the rotation. Sucks for Assad because he's been fine, but it's the best way to maintain depth for the Cubs.
  4. I think it's just unfair to act like everyone here was expecting Jed to do nothing. The panic from some people two weeks ago that the Cubs weren't doing anything when they brought in Civale was silly stuff. Jed gets a bad rap for that horsefeathers. It gets old. I think there are real gripes on Jed. 2025 deadline for sure! But everything we had heard leading up to the deadline is that would be active. Generally speaking, I think the Cubs brought in most of what many thought they would: 2 SP, 1RP and one LHH platoon hitter. And we got Braxton Garrett to boot. I didn't have a pulse on the send outs across the board, but mostly, they did what I expected. People here even had the Holmes idea pretty nailed on, like @Bertzwho suggested he be the fall back pivot at the end of the day. Just think it's fair to point out that not everyone was as doom-and-gloom here.
  5. From Greg Huss who had him 3rd ranked: I hadn't heard anything myself on the receiving, but Huss is clued in. I would assume he's not guessing here. Receiving is probably his weakest from a logical stand point as he's not a natural catcher; He really only moved to a full-time catcher his senior year at Marshall and that's a lot of feel.
  6. I didn't get a direct 1:1 on Mo or Ayers. But I can tell you this: the Cubs weren't going to trade Owen Ayers today and not also get another young C from somewhere else. So this is an assumption but one I think is an easy one to make: if the Cubs were that high on Mo right now, they probably don't require another young C to deal Ayers, because they would have already had one. I'm convinced that both the Cubs adore Owen Ayers and that the Cubs had soured on Ballesteros defensively.
  7. To be fair to the Cubs, they haven't been wrong on this front very often under Hoyer. They won't bat 1.000, and I'll let the article I'm working on (with more information!) do more of the talking, but based on what I heard...I get where they're coming from. At least on Rojas. I've got more information there. Now I know, maybe they could have been "more right" last summer or whatever, but things change, and especially with young players, it takes time on that front. But they've nailed most of their evals when push comes to shove. Benefit of the doubt probably is fair here.
  8. I'm going to try to put this in a way that doesn't make me sound like I'm bragging or trying to flex, but I've had a few conversations over the last few days with people who's names people would recognize who have relayed this on Ayers. I'm not assuming. It's not anyone with the team direct, but it's people I trust very much so. This organization is high on him. Higher than FG is is. They are also higher on Ayers than Rojas, as an example from everything I have gathered. I had Rojas as my #1 prospect two days ago. With what I've heard on how the team views him, I wouldn't have him there any more. If I were to add Rojas into my rankings, my best guess on a Cubs internal is that Hartshorn is #1, with Ayers as the internal second best prospect in the system. I am not entirel sure Rojas would be third, either.
  9. Believe the xFIP. It's always more predictive than the ERA. He's had some weird walk things over the last month. But they aren't normal for him. So either he's broken now, randomly or he had a weird thing. His fWAR is right next to Joe Ryan. I am not worried.
  10. He's had a very up and down year. He started ST hot and looked better mechanically. Then he started Double A cold, heated up super hot and cooled back off. His season is hard to grade from that aspect. The highs have been very high. The lows have been low.
  11. Well, you said "upgraded a bit". They upgraded it *significantly*. The upgraded rotation has nothing to do with their control. I agree, some control would have been even better! But the Cubs added two guys you would have no issues starting a playoff game and replaced two guys you would have a lot of issues starting a playoff game. This is an unquestionably better rotation today.
  12. I think you're underselling how much of a rotation upgrade Gausman and Holmes is over Rea and Assad, here.
  13. Can also name Frias for May/Romero. This deadline, two top-100 types went in those deals.
  14. I think the medicals could be an issue. I've been thinking about it logically, but pulling out of a trade because of Owen Ayers doesn't make sense. It wasn't like that name was new. I heard that name yesterday morning from some people who would know (not Matt) and more today. Matt wrote about it yesterday morning. Matt wrote about it today. Jed doesn't come off as the guy who last second gets emotional about a player and then straight up pulls out. So what would cause a last-second pull out?
  15. Just to square this away a little more: the Brewers traded Frias, who is ranked higher and graded higher on FG for May/Romero. So I'm not entirely sure the Rojas for Holmes/Taylor thing is that crazy when looked through that lens.
  16. MLB.com may see him as the 63rd best prospect but I think based on this trade, you can assume the Cubs do not see him as the 63rd best prospect in baseball. Teams can have wildly different views of player than industry rankings. And that's how you square this trade. I think it's a very heavy price, myself, but I don't think the Cubs agree with me there.
  17. To be honest with you, I don't know why they haven't given him a look, either. The under the hood look at Triple-A isn't incredibly ugly. But I also wonder if they just...don't know what to do with him. Bendix is a former Rays guy and the Rays were always "velo-velo-velo" and Garrett is very much...not that.
  18. Again. I think the Cubs just told you today he's not a catcher. Not to them. Not anymore. A DH who can hit like Mo isn't very rare.
  19. There's some Justin Steele in his game. I don't mean to say he's going to be Steele, but in his pitch shapes and what not, you can find similarities. I think he's a fun project.
  20. I don't think they made the trade based on 16 IP. But I do think today the Cubs told you Mo isn't a catcher. And if he's a DH, he's a DH who doesn't hit LHP well. The line on Mo was always "is he a catcher or a DH?" Behind the plate he's a great young player. As a DH it's a hard one to find a ton of value. So I think the value here matches.
  21. At this point I don't care one way or the other. They're not getting much of anything back for Rea, so the depth might matter more than the lottery ticket. If they do move him? Fine by me, too.
  22. My guess too. I had four names: 2 SP, 1 BP and 1 bat as my guess and they got all of those things. I suspect we are mostly done. IF they do anything else, I think it's small stuff where they shuffle a few prospects who they have to protect in the winter but aren't planning on it.
×
×
  • Create New...