Jump to content
North Side Baseball

UMFan83

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    95,285
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    73

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by UMFan83

  1. 10 teams is still loss than every other major professional sport in the US MLB - 8/30 NFL - 12/32 NHL - 16/30 NBA - 16/30
  2. releasing him would be really productive. As opposed to....
  3. Rich Harden - Josh Vitters - Felix Pie - Lou Piniella - Derrek Lee for Halladay
  4. But then teams are going to be conservative the last 5 minutes of the 3rd period, etc etc etc
  5. He's putting up good numbers in the VWL because he's facing Rich Hill.
  6. If shootouts are going to exists, I think that if you lose in OT you get zero points. If it gets to the SO than each team gets a point, like it's a tie and then the SO is for the extra point. This might give more incentive to try to win in OT (not saying teams stall to get to the SO, but I would assume it happens). No, I think it would do the opposite. If you got zero points for losing in OT, everyone would hang back and not take any chances because they would just try to get into the SO to make sure they got that point. That's actually why they set it up the way they did, to try to get teams to take chances and make the OT exciting. Same reason it's 4-on-4. Basically since there is arguements both ways about teams slacking off to get that 1 point, I think thats case enough that the OT/SO system is flawed. 2 points for a win, 1 for a tie, 0 for a loss. Just do it. Except that goes back to the problem people mentioned where nobody is going to risk losing in OT, and losing that point. OK, then cancel hockey.
  7. Yeah time to release him. Certifiable headcase. I hope he gets it together on another team.
  8. I've always been against letting more teams into the playoffs. It's not even really the playoffs, its a play in game. I guess I'm just a traditionalist but I feel like a division winner should be at an advantage over the WC winner. The thing is, the WC team can sneak into the playoffs and ride an ace or two to the championship, and I don't like that. I'm sure there are people that feel the other way though.
  9. If shootouts are going to exists, I think that if you lose in OT you get zero points. If it gets to the SO than each team gets a point, like it's a tie and then the SO is for the extra point. This might give more incentive to try to win in OT (not saying teams stall to get to the SO, but I would assume it happens). No, I think it would do the opposite. If you got zero points for losing in OT, everyone would hang back and not take any chances because they would just try to get into the SO to make sure they got that point. That's actually why they set it up the way they did, to try to get teams to take chances and make the OT exciting. Same reason it's 4-on-4. Basically since there is arguements both ways about teams slacking off to get that 1 point, I think thats case enough that the OT/SO system is flawed. 2 points for a win, 1 for a tie, 0 for a loss. Just do it.
  10. I have always been in favor of the "2 wild card teams play a 1 game playoff, have to face #1 seed right after" idea.
  11. For such a "great" closer, he sure gets shopped by teams a lot. I'm sure its not a personality issue....:rolleyes:
  12. Also, I hate the fact that a SO Winner gets 2 points and a SO Loser gets 1. I'm not suggesting the SO becomes all or nothing, because we all know how stupid that would be. Can't we just go back to ties? It's the only sports I perfectly accept ties in, and they don't have them anymore.
  13. Or he just knows they will be cheaper
  14. If they insist on keeping shootouts, can they at least move it to a best of 5 or 7 instead of best of 3? I feel like you get all excited for a shootout and then all the sudden the opponent scores on their first try, then you miss on your first try and all the sudden your backs are to the wall.
  15. Tyrus Thomas impressed me in garbage time last night. I saw things I haven't seen from him this year such as attacking the basket and getting hands on a lot of balls defensively. He did keep up with his 1 goaltending per game average though.
  16. If (and I mean if) we put a hurting on the Rams, it could go a long way to gaining some confidence at least.
  17. 3 straight chances to win here YEAH HAWKS WIN!!!!! As crappy as losing a shootout feels, winning a shootout feels just as awesome
  18. Sharp!!!! 2 goal lead in the shootout!
  19. Gah, one pass too many in OT. You gotta get the shot off there
  20. See what I mean about toying?
  21. Watching the Lakers is like watching a different version of the mid-90's Bulls. They are just toying with the Bulls right now. They really feel like whenever they get around to pulling away they will, as they did in the second. They underestimated the Bulls scrappiness and didn't hustle back on transition, letting the Bulls get some cheap baskets and get back into the game, but rest assured, the Lakers will be winning this one. The Bulls look like dwarfs compared to the Lakers front court, its amazing we've been able to get any rebounds over them. Pau Gasol is a nightmare for the Bulls, now I remember why Memphis always seemed to play us well even if their bad years.
  22. Don't you DARE!!!! ;) Nah, they will lose in the shootout.
×
×
  • Create New...