UMFan83
-
Posts
95,285 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
73
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by UMFan83
-
I saw 6 new pages of posts and assumed we signed like 6 top FAs by now.
-
Philly also signed TO and did they get that tackle from the Bills in a trade or FA? Those were both pretty high priced FA acquisitions. Isn't Asante Samuel a pretty big name in FA? I feel like TO was traded to the Eagles though. Those teams typically don't go after FAs because their GMs can draft. Ours for the most part can't so what are we supposed to do? Besides, you could count the Bears in the list of teams that typically didn't go after FAs before this year, and they certainly haven't been world beaters, and there are teams that do go after FAs occasionally and are good most of the time. The bottom line is, I am not huge on FAs, and I would much rather build through the draft. But in our situation, it's a no brainer that we fill some holes with FA. Hell our "2nd round pick" died this offseason.
-
It doesn't work for the Redskins because they do this every year trying to fill every hole with the latest FA. FAs are typically older and have less shelf life than someone you draft due to the experience you have to have to be an unrestracted FA. I don't necessarily think the Bears are changing their talent acquisition strategy to signing big named FAs every year. I think due to the Cutler and Adams trades, they are in a situation where they have obvious holes to fill, an uncapped year coming up, an aging defensive core that needs to win now, no draft picks until the 3rd round, and the HC and GM's jobs likely on the line. So in this situation it makes absolute sense to throw a crapload of money at the biggest FAs of need. If the Bears go 11-5 next year and make a run in the playoffs, I highly doubt they are going into the off season trying to make a run at the biggest FAs again. This is a one time thing. If it fails, Lovie and likely Angelo are gone. If it works, its back to the draft strategy, although it's possible Angelo might revise his previous strategy and incorporate a possible FA here and there into the mix. And by that I mean bigger names than Frank Omiyale or Marty Booker, but smaller names than Julius Peppers.
-
I've spent way too many hours in my life refreshing message boards hoping for players that never end up coming here. I won't get excited until the press conference.
-
We're not getting Rolle. And no I'd rather have Taylor than Westbrook. Westbrook is a concussion away from retiring. Fair enough. I do think Taylor is overrated on this board though. I like Taylor a lot. Or at least the last time he got a full season's worth of carries. But then again it's been several years since he played with an offensive line that wasn't the Vikings.
-
I can't remember ever waiting for FA to start because the Bears haven't ever been involved in the big names. Does anything happen tonight, or should I not bother waiting up?
-
Beaten by 4 minutes
-
PFT is making it seem like Rolle is not a Bear just yet and he'll be going to visit the Giants tomorrow morning if nothing is agreed upon tonight. Chris Mortensen is hearing that the Rolle sweepstakes will come down to the Giants and Dolphins. (Even though the Bears were negotiating first.) http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/04/rolle-expected-to-visit-giants/
-
Why should they? They shouldn't. My post was saying don't get mad at this season, the Bulls brass doesn't care so why should we. This season isn't important. Well, yeah. Some of us have been saying that the entire time. Yeah it's just a reminder to frustrated fans like GeoSoto
-
I they both feed into the mix. Part of it is injuries, part of it is the trades (which is really killing us in the post defensively and rebounding wise) and part of it is not having the depth to withstand everything that happened.
-
Why should they? They shouldn't. My post was saying don't get mad at this season, the Bulls brass doesn't care so why should we. This season isn't important.
-
Of course. But I honestly think they thought the Bulls would still be a playoff team and probably 95% as good as before the trades. They still might be, but they are clearly worse. No one should/will get mad at GarPax if the trades lead to a max FA signed. They had to do the trades for that. Oh and also, the Bulls didn't need to trade Tyrus, they were just sick of his crap. They could have kept him and renounced his rights early on in the offseason and I believe they'd be around the same spot cap wise.
-
you mean since noah got hurt It's not just that though. The Bulls went from statistically the best rebounding team in the NBA to being outrebounded 109-68 the last 2 games (33-16 offensively). That's not just Noah.
-
I want to be bothered by this now, but you know the Bulls brass doesn't give 2 craps that we apparently seem to be worse since the Tyrus/Salmons trade. No one should really care if the Bulls win or lose these games. As fun as it would be to see them make the playoffs, the cards are stacked against them. They have no depth and are beaten up. Save your angst until we see how things go in the summer because this season is pointless. The games are basically just opportunities to develop Derrick Rose and auditions for possibly role players on next year's team.
-
It wouldn't surprise me if Washington got him. Washington is the most profitable team in sports, their owner loves to spend on FAs and there is no salary cap next year. It's a no brainer.
-
I just got an email from the Bears previewing free agency with the headline "READY TO ROLL". Coincidence? (Rolle)
-
What if Bradley was just making a joke and the quote was taken out of context and gobbled up by the Chicago media?
-
Wow seeing as how this board has shown almost no buzz for the Cubs lately, I'm pretty surprised that this thread got 8 pages. Of course nothing will match how we used to be on this board. In 2006, the first spring training thread got 22 pages. 2007 we got 19 pages. 2008 we got 16 pages. 2009 we dropped to 6 and now 8 this year. -
Millar’s chances of making Cubs improving
UMFan83 replied to Schwarber Fan's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
The Cubs are a running joke of cliches. Need more left handed bats? Only if they replace better players to do so. Bad experience with a disgruntled teammate? Consider keeping an over the hill below mediocre player because he's a people person. -
Fox 2-2 2 HR, 4 spectacular plays at 3B
-
With the win, the Hawks have tied the Sharks for 1st in the East, with equal number of games played. Washington remains 3 points ahead of the Hawks for best record in hockey, also with equal games played.
-
Yay
-
I want to see the Hawks put in 3 goals this period and win running away.
-
well, they should have had more goals last night and should have at least 4 tonight. for some reason goalies continue to stand on their heads when playing us After seeing people (including myself) complain about that just about every night you have to wonder if that's really the case.
-
Blah, I'm overreacting a bit. Just frustrating to see one of the worst teams in hockey lead on our home ice towards the end of the 2nd period. But at least we are tied going into intermission. Oilers only have 11 SOG, and 2 have gone in hah.
