See thats what I think. I know I'd be up in arms if it was against the Bears, but based on what I knew of the rules, it looked INC the first time I saw it. People have made it seem like he completely landed and stopped rolling, and then used the hand with the ball to help himself up and just dropped the ball. In reality, in one motion he rolled, and as soon as the ball it the ground it bounced away from him. It's possible he was trying to prop himself back up with it in the same motion, but that's his fault for doing that. And there is absolutely no way he just dropped the ball, the ground caused that ball to come free, and since he was still in the process of making the catch IMO. The thing is, the people that are livid think the act of the catch was over, and the others disagree. I don't think there is any way that either side is going to convince the other. For the record I'm in the good call bad rule camp. But I'll take it.