So they weren't actually a good team...only Rose was good and they tricked everyone to make it where they did? This is damn near gibberish. Wait...what? Don't get it twisted. Paxson did very little to make that team better in 2010. They still had the players in place before that season started and Rose covered up the huge hole of deficiencies on that team. *If this team was so great in 2011 the bulls with or without Rose should have gotten past the first round. OK I've obviously wasted my time as you know nothing about basketball. Guess how many 2009-2010 Bulls played on the 2010-2011 Bulls? 4! They went from 27th in offense and 13th in defensive rating to 11th and 1st. So you're telling me that Derrick Rose singlehandedly made them go from a mediocre team to the top 2-3 in the NBA just from an offseason of improvement? And that the addition of Thibs, Brewer, Bogans, Asik, Thomas and Watson had nothing to do with the Bulls improving into the best defense in the NBA? It was just Derrick Rose learning how to guard all 5 positions at once? Please read a book on basketball before continuing to post in this thread. Any book. Seriously, I'm would think even a book like this one would somehow help you improve your basketball knowledge: http://s.ecrater.com/stores/158321/4c0efe86bb026_158321n.jpg So you're going to tell me that Brewer, Bogans, Asik, Thomas and Watson had a whole lot to do with their jump in offensive rating? Yes I am telling you Derrick Rose made that ENTIRE team better. There's no [expletive] doubt about that. But Pax's FA moves build a solid core around him that made the team much better. And I'd say that Korver instead of Hakeem Warrick, Watson instead of Flip Murray and Boozer instead of Chris Richard had something to do with the Bulls offense improving. Again, Derrick's the biggest improvement offensively but not even Michael Jordan could turn the 2009-2010 Bulls into a 62 win team. Their best 3 point shooter was Flip Murray...Chris Richard was their backup PF, etc etc.