If there is a pitching starved team out there looking to add 2 rotation pieces, and loses out on Tanaka, Garza, Santana, Jimenez, Kazmir, Nolasco, etc... in free agency, and doesn't have the luxury of trading prospects or surplus hitting to get a starter, then I could see that team looking at EJax's 3 years and 33 million, and saying "not ideal, but not bad either." Personally, I think the Cubs could get the Giants and Blue Jays interested. Oh, I think he IS tradeable. Just doubt we'd get much for him currently. If he has a 3ish ERA at the break next year, some team may give up a top 100 guy + at that point, based on the reasonable contract. Even with the decent peripherals, I think his true numbers look too bad for someone to give up a halfway solid return currently. I was looking at it purely as salary relief. If I got just a fringe prospect, but freed up the $11M per season, I'd call it a win and move to the next order of business. He should have never been signed in the first place. We all knew it the day it happened - panic move after losing out on signing Anibal. Theo basically confessed to it this week. No, we all didn't know it. Jackson is still worth his contract. He only shouldn't have been signed in the first place if you don't plan on competing until 2017.