1,627-1,512. That's a .518 winning percentage. If you remove the Tampa Bay years, which were some of the worst teams ever assembled, his winning percentage goes to .538. Why would we remove those? Can we remove his best three seasons also? Either way, that's good but it isn't earth-shattering. I think the reason he's eliminating the Tampa years is because they simply didn't have the talent to win and there was nothing Lou could do about it. The powers that be in Tampa wouldn't spend the money and he had crap teams - therefore making it a little unfair to blame him for poor seasons. I don't care who the manager is, if he has abysmal talent, he won't have a good record. I don't care who the manager is, if he has great talent, he'll have a good record.